Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Dec
2
2014
North Carolina Court of Appeals Addresses Limitations Period Applicable to Utility Easement Encroachment Claim Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
20
2015
Arris Group v. C-Cation Tech: Indemnitor Merely Sending Advice Does Not Result in Privity IPR2015-00635 Faegre Drinker
Mar
8
2016
Front Row Tech. v. MLB Advanced Media: Denying Institution where Effective Filing Date had been Alleged to Correspond to Date of Later-Filed Amendment PGR2015-00023 Faegre Drinker
Apr
3
2017
Antitrust Umps Throw Out Information Exchanges Relating To LA Dodgers Broadcast Rights McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
28
2017
Appeals Court Affirms Dismissal on Standing Grounds of Biometric Privacy Suit over Videogame Facial Scan Feature Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
15
2018
N.D. Cal. Releases Comprehensive Procedural Guidance for Class Action Settlements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
12
2019
The LeBron Effect, Grand Slams and Record Sales: Matching Rights in Football Kit Sponsorship Deals Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
5
2020
Illinois Supreme Court Affirms School District Must Pay for Emergency Construction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
13
2013
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Freezes Assets and Brings Civil Charges against EB-5 Investor Visa Project Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
30
2014
BioMarin Pharm. Inc. v. Genzyme therapeutic Products Ltd. P’ship.: Granting Request to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2013-00534, 537 Faegre Drinker
Dec
21
2015
Employment Law This Week - Episode 9 - Week of December 21, 2015 [VIDEO] Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Aug
19
2016
Wisconsin Court Finds Anti-Poaching Agreements to be Unenforceable Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
28
2017
Lessons for Employers from a Recent ALJ Decision Narrowing the DOL’s Requests for Employees’ Contact Information Vedder Price
Aug
3
2018
Serial Plaintiff Enjoys Another Ride on The TCPA Litigation Gravy Train Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
21
2019
Best Practices for Plan Sponsors #10 Faegre Drinker
Mar
23
2022
Using Demonstrative Exhibits as Admissible Evidence Under California Law Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
31
2024
Sotera Stipulation Filed After the Patent Owner’s Response Still Deemed Effective Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
18
2012
New Jersey Construction Lien Law Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Apr
3
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 3, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
13
2016
“Ladies’ Night” Promotions in Hong Kong – Good Business or Unlawful Discrimination? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
1
2017
Infringement of Method Claim Still Requires Performance of Every Claimed Step McDermott Will & Emery
May
13
2021
Obtaining the Benefits of a Performance Bond: Tread Carefully Robinson & Cole LLP
Oct
14
2021
Authentication Claim Under Alice—A Two-Step Process McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
19
2022
Third Circuit Wrestles with Sufficiency of Notice Letter under Federal Clean Water Act ArentFox Schiff LLP
Oct
6
2023
Trinity Info Media, LLC, fka Trinity Intel Media, LLC, v. Covalent, Inc., No. 2022-1308 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) (“Opinion”) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
29
2012
Does Your Firm's Standard Lien Language Create a Possibility that Your Customer IRAs May Lose Their Tax Exempt Status and Protection from Third-Party Creditors? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jan
2
2014
Federal Court of Appeals Holds that Disparate Discipline and Anti-Union Remarks Support First Amendment Claims of Police Officer and Union Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
3
2014
Cert Alert: Is the Trademark Trial and Appeal Bound (TTAB) Decision on Likelihood of Confusion Preclusive? McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins