Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
20
2020
I-9 Compliance Flexibility Extended to August 19, 2020 Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
13
2022
Withdrawing Trump-Era Policy on Standard Essential Patents, Agencies Favor ‘Case by Case’ Approach MoginRubin
Jan
26
2024
New York Wage & Hour Update: New York Appellate Division, Second Department, Finds No Private Right of Action for Frequency of Pay Claims and Governor Hochul Proposes Amendments to Limit Recovery of Liquidated Damages for Frequency of Pay Claims Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
6
2013
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Week in Review: January 28 - February 1, 2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
31
2014
Supreme Court Alice Corp. vs. CLS Bank - What do "Abacus Guy," Mom, and Computers That Say "Stop!" Have in Common? They May be Unpatentable Abstract Ideas Bracewell LLP
Jan
24
2017
State Attorneys General Move to Intervene in PHH Matter Covington & Burling LLP
Jun
8
2017
PTO Litigation Report – June 8, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
14
2019
Delaware Court of Chancery Declares Ineffective Exclusive Federal Forum Provision for 1933 Act Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
21
2020
IMS Insights Podcast: Episode 12- Chris Ritter The Core Values of Jurors and Behavioral Economics at Trial IMS Legal Strategies
Oct
14
2021
Shareholder Files Derivative Suit Targeting Company Executives for Greenwashing Robinson & Cole LLP
Mar
24
2022
FTC Announces Proposed Settlement with CafePress over Alleged Data Breach Cover Up Hunton Andrews Kurth
Oct
3
2023
Genuine Issue of Facet: Court Denies a Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment Due to Questions as to the Existence of an Agency Relationship Troutman Amin, LLP
Dec
23
2013
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Approves Consent Order Regarding “Made in USA” False Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
28
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 28, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
13
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 13, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
14
2016
Georgia Council for the Hearing-Impaired To Pay $10,000 to Settle EEEOC Retaliation Lawsuit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Oct
27
2016
Inherent Disclosure Supplies Adequate Written Description for Priority Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2017
D.C. Circuit Strikes Down Challenge to Application of ITAR Brokering Regulations to Practicing Attorneys Holland & Hart LLP
Nov
8
2018
Preparing your Company for Discovery with Cloud Faxing eFaxCorporate
Mar
5
2020
Sierra Creative Systems Settles EEOC Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Lawsuit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
May
17
2021
Part 2: Prosecution History Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Finnegan
Jul
23
2021
Federal Court Upholds Campus Vaccine Mandate...with Caveats Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Jan
3
2022
Telecom Alert: Affordable Connectivity Program Launch; FCC 6 GHz Order Upheld; 911 Fee Diversion Petitions Pleading Cycle; Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Petition [Vol. XIX, Issue 1] Keller and Heckman LLP
Apr
14
2023
Law of the Land - Real Estate Litigation Newsletter (April 13, 2023) Goulston & Storrs
Jan
4
2012
California Appellate Court Issues a Decision That Mutual of Omaha Insurance Agents Qualify as Independent Contractors as a Matter of Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
4
2013
Can You Hear Me Now? Tips for Communicating with Counsel Dickinson Wright PLLC
May
31
2014
Developer-Prepared Cost Comparisons Can Show Economic Infeasibility Under CEQA - California Environmental Quality Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2016
Hail Mary to U.S. Supreme Court? Owner of REDSKINS Marks Petitions for Hearing on Constitutionality of Section 2(a) of Lanham Act Katten
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins