Dec 5 2010 |
Bank Had No Duty to Advise Business Charge Card Owner that Bank had Obtained Judgment Against a Person Who Was Authorized to Use the Card |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 5 2011 |
Untimely Filing Of Motion To Dismiss Does Not Warrant Automatic Dismissal Where Motion Is Meritorious And Opposing Party Will Not Be Prejudiced |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 27 2011 |
Generic Drug Manufacturers And Failure To Warn: What duty is there after Pliva v. Mensing? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 15 2011 |
California Appellate Court Analyzes Employment Arbitration Agreement after Supreme Court's AT&T Decision |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 10 2013 |
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Apply the "Discovery Rule" to Extend the Five-Year Statute of Limitations for SEC Punitive Fraud Enforcement Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 27 2013 |
Delaware Chancery Court Decisions Highlight That a "Crucial Difference" In Analyzing Director Liability For "Bad Faith" In the Context of an M&A Sales Process Is the Seriousness of the Bidder |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 30 2013 |
Ninth Circuit Rules that Comcast Does Not Kill Wage and Hour Class Actions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 25 2014 |
The Commercial Decision Reviews Arbitrations: Three Recent Decisions Clarify Standards For Actions Brought Pursuant To Article 75 of the CPLR |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 15 2015 |
Creative Construction: The Ninth Circuit Relaxes Removal Statute’s Timeliness Test in Class Action Fairness Act Case |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 23 2020 |
Rolls-Royce Seeks to Resolve Circuit Split on Whether District Courts Can Order Discovery For Use in Private Arbitration |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 14 2020 |
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 9 2022 |
Commercial Division to Adopt New Rule Requiring Interlineation of Responsive Pleadings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 17 2024 |
CFPB Sues Fintech for Deceptive Practices Surrounding Tipping Service |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 31 2010 |
California Courts Affirm Additional Settlements Over Vigorous Objections |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 14 2010 |
Sixth Circuit Remains Firm On Rule 9(b) In False Claims Act Litigation |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 23 2010 |
Supreme Court To Decide Fate Of Global Warming Litigation In American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 7 2011 |
Delaware Supreme Court Reverses Chancery Court Dismissal Of Derivative Plaintiff's Section 220 Books And Records Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 4 2013 |
California Supreme Court Resolves Split Over Accrual Rules for Unfair Competition Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 22 2013 |
The People's Supreme Court of China Issues Judicial Interpretation to Define Foreign-Related Civil Relationships |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 22 2013 |
Second Circuit Upholds Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements that Bar Title VII Class Actions, Finding that there is no Substantive Statutory Right to Pursue a Pattern-or-Practice Claim |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 1 2013 |
Comcast v. Behrend Sets a Higher Bar for Class Certification |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 22 2013 |
Fifth Circuit Holds That Securities Fraud Defendants May Not Rebut the Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption at the Class Certification Stage Through Evidence of No Price Impact |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 20 2016 |
Did the FCA’s “Implied Certification” Theory Dodge a Bullet? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 20 2019 |
Ending Up On The Naughty List: Dismissal Of A Pending Appeal Under The Disentitlement Doctrine |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 18 2020 |
New Jersey Gives Employers a Break on New WARN Requirements Due to COVID-19 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 28 2022 |
California Supreme Court Holds That McDonnell Douglas Standard Should Not Be Used When Evaluating Whistleblower Retaliation Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 9 2022 |
California Court of Appeal Makes Clear that PAGA Plaintiffs are not Entitled to a Jury Trial and Provides Helpful Guidance on Suitable Seating Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 1 2022 |
NLRB to Decide Whether Misclassification Is Standalone Violation of the NLRA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 24 2023 |
Failure to Timely Produce in Discovery Underlying Written Contract with Insured Prevented General Contractor from Establishing Status as an Additional Insured |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 1 2010 |
United States Supreme Court Limits Extraterritorial Reach Of Private Federal Securities Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 25 2010 |
Delaware Supreme Court Requires Credible Evidence of a "Proper Purpose" to Review a Corporation's Books and Records |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 20 2011 |
The Supreme Court To Decide Whether FOIA Responses Trigger The False Claims Act's Public Disclosure Bar |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 12 2011 |
California Court of Appeal Holds That State Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Securities Act Class Actions Unless the Action Is a "Covered Class Action" and Involves a "Covered Security" Under SLUSA |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 5 2011 |
A Chapter 11 Diaspora? House Judiciary Committee Considers Chapter 11 Venue Reform |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 12 2013 |
Second Circuit Imposes Individual Liability on New York Mayoral Candidate for Fair Labor Standards Act Settlement |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |