Jun 13 2023 |
FTC Modifies Role of Administrative Judges Amid Heightened Agency Scrutiny |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 17 2023 |
Fifth Circuit Rules to Reinstate Abortion Pill Restrictions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 13 2023 |
Challenging Other Transaction Agreements – Navigating the Jurisdictional Highway |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 14 2024 |
SCOTUS Declines to Review New York City’s Rent Stabilization Law |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 10 2024 |
How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in a Schedule A Trademark Case in the Northern District of Illinois |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 1 2010 |
Second Circuit Rejects $2 Billion Class Action Award Against The Republic of Argentina |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 12 2010 |
Rush To Judgment - FAR Councils Propose Daily Compounding Of Interest For TINA Violations |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 20 2011 |
China's Supreme People's Court Issues Notice on Trial of Cases Involving Transfers of Nonperforming Assets to Foreign Investors |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 24 2011 |
Aspartame Class Action Dismissal Affirmed on Statute of Limitations Grounds |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2011 |
United States Supreme Court Reiterates Materiality Standard For Securities Fraud Claims Under Rule 10b-5 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 25 2011 |
The California Court of Appeal Again Chips Away at In re Tobacco II |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 13 2014 |
FINRA Issues Guidance Notice on Confidentiality Provisions in Settlement Agreements and the Arbitration Discovery Process |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 20 2014 |
California Supreme Court to Review Denial of Homeowner’s Private Beach Access |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 6 2015 |
It’s Not Personal: Ninth Circuit Denies Putative Class Representative’s Appeal as Moot |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 10 2019 |
Commercial Division Denies Plaintiff’s Request for Additional Time to Serve Complaint After Plaintiff LLC Failed to Appear Through Counsel |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 10 2020 |
Virtual and Hybrid Shareholder Meetings in the Era of COVID-19: What Public Companies Need to Know |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 15 2022 |
California Court of Appeal Holds that a Corporation’s Direct Cause of Action for Breach of Fiduciary Duty is Legal Rather than Equitable, Requiring a Trial by Jury |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 14 2023 |
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. No. 22-1268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 9 2024 |
Bank Groups Sue to Overturn New Community Lending Rules |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 30 2009 |
California Passes New Electronic Discovery Act Effective Immediately |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 1 2010 |
Ninth Circuit Clarifies Rule 23 Class Certification Standard |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 11 2010 |
California Court Addresses "Stray Remarks Doctrine" In Employment Discrimination Cases |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 18 2010 |
No Private Right of Action for Violation of Statutes Extending Notice Period for Foreclosures |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 29 2011 |
A MATRIXX Revolution, Part II: Supreme Court affirms Ninth Circuit's holding that Life Science Companies Cannot Rely On a Statistical Significance Standard When Deciding Whether Adverse Event Reports are Material for the Purpose of Securities Disclosures |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 12 2011 |
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Relief a Shareholder is Entitled For Inspection of Corporate Books And Records Pursuant To A Section 220 Demand |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 7 2013 |
Art Law: Russian Revolution Redux - Seized Painting During Russian Revolution |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 19 2013 |
Massachusetts District Court Finds No Inference of Conspiracy Arising From Members of Standard Setting Organization Pursuing Self Interest In Refusing To Approve Plaintiff's Competing Technology |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 10 2014 |
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Report Targets Arbitration Clauses |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 18 2014 |
Ninth Circuit Rules That Twombly Standard of Specificity Applies to FLSA Pleadings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 21 2014 |
Mandatory Reporting of Foreign Direct Investments in the U.S. |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 1 2015 |
The Broader Problem: European Bank Creates an Easy Catch for the Long Arm of U.S. Jurisdiction |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 16 2015 |
California Court of Appeal Refuses to Enforce Forum Selection Clause Because Employer Would Not Stipulate to Apply California Law and Did Not Show that the Foreign State’s Legal Protections Were Equal to California’s |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 22 2020 |
Fifth Circuit Affirms Attorney’s Fee Award of $2.3 million in Misappropriation Case Against Former Employee who Failed to Comply with Court’s Objections Order |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 29 2021 |
“What’s In A Name?”: Federal Circuit Holds Claims Court Blurred Distinction Between ‘Size Protests’ And ‘Bid Protests’ In Dismissal For Failure To Exhaust Administrative Remedies |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 4 2023 |
New York Courts Continue to Assert Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Banks |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |