Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Mar
26
2018
Wisconsin’s Court of Appeals Holds That a NonLawyer Personal Representative May Not Initiate an Appeal Foley & Lardner LLP
May
28
2015
Wisconsin's Supreme Court Creates More Power for the Arbitrator Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
27
2011
Wisconsin Tort Reform 2011: Governor signed the Omnibus Tort Reform Act Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
22
2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court: “Follow Form” Provision May Trigger the Duty to Defend Under Indemnity Policies Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
19
2010
Wisconsin Supreme Court: Settling Within Policy Limits Does Not Preclude a Bad Faith Claim Against Insurer Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
1
2012
Wisconsin Supreme Court: Reservation of Rights Letter Not Required to Preserve Coverage Defenses Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
24
2011
Wisconsin Supreme Court Limits WDNR’s Authority Regarding WPDES Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
25
2015
Wisconsin Supreme Court Applies the Discovery Rule to Accrual of Wrongful Death Claims Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
9
2017
Wisconsin Supreme Court Addresses Expert Testimony Under Daubert Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
28
2011
Wisconsin Omnibus Tort Bill is Signed von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Feb
13
2024
Wisconsin Federal District Court Issues Five Rulings on Motions to Dismiss 401(k) Investment and Fee Cases – Is There a Way to Reconcile Them? Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
6
2013
Wisconsin District Court Finds Employer’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Direct Threat Evidence Insufficient Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
24
2015
Wisconsin Courts Can Consider Documents Referred to in a Complaint, Even if They Are Not Attached to the Complaint Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
26
2018
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Issues Important Decision under “Borrowing” Statute Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
17
2013
Wisconsin Court of Appeals Holds the Omnibus Statute, Wis. Stat. § 632.32, Requires an Auto Insurer to Provide Coverage to a Permissive User Tortfeasor in a Suit Filed by the Named Insured von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Apr
17
2013
Wisconsin Court Of Appeals Decides "Health Insurance Plan Design" Includes Out-Of-Pocket Costs To Employees and Therefore is a Prohibited Subject Of Bargaining von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Mar
10
2016
Wiretapping: Watch What You Write, Watch What You Say Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
11
2015
Winghaven Residential Owners Ass'n v. Bridges -- Useful Case for Resisting Large Atty Fees in the Face of a Small Recovery Armstrong Teasdale
May
5
2014
Wind Farms and Eagle “Take” Permits – Litigation is Coming Over the New “30-Year” Permit Rule McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
20
2010
Willow Bend v. Downtown ABQ Partners: Tethering Personal Jurisdiction To The Substantive Law Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
29
2012
Willful Infringement Will Now Be Harder to Prove Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Sep
24
2013
Will Usual and Customary Price be the Next False Claims Act Battleground? Mintz
Jan
16
2013
Will the Ex Parte Young Doctrine Swallow Tribal Sovereign Immunity Whole? Dickinson Wright PLLC
Mar
15
2016
Will Supreme Court Put Brakes on False Claims Act Litigation? Faegre Drinker
Dec
10
2023
Will Supreme Court Consider Whether to Allow an Alternative to In-App Purchasing on the App Store? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
7
2022
Will Group Costs Orders "anchor" Class Actions in Victoria? K&L Gates
Dec
1
2015
Will Amendments to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) and 37(e) Reduce the Scope and Costs of Discovery? Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Jul
15
2023
Will a Half-Victory for Ripple Labs Create a Wave of Good News for Digital Asset Exchanges? Mintz
Sep
1
2013
WildTangent Files its Supreme Court Certiorari Petition in Patent Infringement Case – Part 1 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
25
2020
Why Wait To Appeal? Texas Has A Permissive Appeal Statute That Allows Parties To Appeal Interlocutory Orders If Certain Conditions Exist Winstead
Mar
10
2022
Why Storytelling is Your Best Defense IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
4
2012
Why Pre-Tender Defense Costs Are Recoverable: is the “Actual Notice” Rule a Bar or Not? Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Oct
19
2021
Why Legal Teams Need Digital Contracting for Modern Business Ironclad
May
21
2021
Why Jury Trials Are Disappearing Even Though Civil Attorneys Prefer Them IMS Legal Strategies
Feb
1
2023
Why Is McDonald's Former V.P. Being Judged In Delaware By Delaware Law? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins