Litigation / Trial Practice

Litigation actions brought in the United States at the federal and state levels, cases in front of the  US Supreme Court (SCOTUS), and cases litigated before the different courts that comprise the US Court of Special Jurisdiction are among the different stories, news, and litigation, visitors to the National Law Review will read about on the litigation trial practice area of law.

Special jurisdictions including Federal Circuits, the Court of Special Jurisdictions, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), US Tax Court, the Patent and Trademark Appeals Board (PTAB), and other agency-related litigation and trial news is analyzed by the legal experts at the National Law Review. Actions and litigation brought to these special courts, coverage of tax appeals, bankruptcy proceedings, and international litigation which arise in the United States, Canada, China, the United Kingdom, and the European Union are also covered by the National Law Review.

Business and commercial litigation, patent litigation including inter partes reviews (IPRs), class action lawsuits, government actions, multi-party and multi-jurisdiction litigation, communications, environmental law, products liability claims, and trust and estate litigation, are topics that are covered on the site. Visitors can also read about the latest litigation in product liability claims, insurance claims, intellectual property, mergers and acquisition litigation, real estate development, and white-collar criminal actions, which involve prominent C-level executives and highly paid board members, on the National Law Review. Whistleblower litigation and stories of employees reporting high-level executives are also highly covered on the site. The impact of court cases across a variety of legal areas is analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review.

Along with breaking down the court’s decisions and opinions, NLR also covers information related to the trial and appellate-level practice in the United States. Evidentiary rules and hearings, eDiscovery claims, tort reform lawsuits, disputes arising out of the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), and other state and federal appeals are covered online by the National Law Review.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Nov
7
2013
California Court of Appeal Holds That Challenges to Corporate Elections Under Corporations Code Section 709 May Be Predicated Upon Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Conflict of Interest Allegations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2019
California Supreme Court Announces a Win for Payroll Outsourcing Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2011
Municipalities Are Responsible For Discharges Of Stormwater Regardless Of The Ultimate Source Of Pollution Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
20
2014
China Court Ruled Infringement for Ambush Marketing in Film Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
9
2022
Signed, Sealed, Delivered? Fifth Circuit Finds Sealing of Sensitive Information Requires Far More Than a Protective Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
16
2011
Court Tosses Transpacific Air Passengers' Claims Based on Alleged Overcharges for Flights Originating in Asia Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
24
2014
Ninth Circuit Rejects Use of Preemptive Litigation to Validate Federal Approvals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
26
2011
In Pineda's Wake: Constraints on Song-Beverly Class Action Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2022
Los Angeles Superior Court Invalidates California Law Requiring Gender Diversity on Company Boards Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2013
Substantial Evidence Test Applies to Decision Not to Require Additional Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2018
Patent Strategies for Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
17
2018
FCA Materiality: It’s One thing to Proclaim but It’s Another Thing to Prove Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
25
2022
Supreme Court Discrimination Case Narrows Scope of Restitution for Individuals Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
12
2011
New York High Court Applies the "Single-Entity Exemption" in the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2018
Escobar’s Demanding Materiality Standard Nixes $350 Million Verdict Against Florida Nursing Facility Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
22
2011
California Court Of Appeal Holds That Employees Lose Reinstatement Rights If They Fail To Return To Work During The 12-Week Leave Period Protected Under CFRA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
12
2018
Developer Had No Right to Independent Counsel Based on a Possible Conflict of Interest for Carrier-Appointed Counsel Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2011
Ninth Circuit Attempts to Clarify Learned Professional Exemption's Educational Requirement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2014
Ninth Circuit Rejects Percentage Method To Determine Attorneys’ Fees In Class Action Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
15
2019
District Court Provides Guidance On Climate Change Analysis Under NEPA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
27
2018
Ninth Circuit Weighs In On Circuit Split Regarding CERCLA Contribution Claims After Settlement and The Statute of Limitation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
29
2020
(Cheer)Leading By Example: UK’s Cheerleading Scandal and Lessons for Leaders Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2014
Ninth Circuit Concludes That Common Issues Do Not Predominate Where Retailer’s In-Store Signs and Oral Sales Statements Place Each Putative Class Member’s Exposure to Misleading Statements in Doubt Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
9
2018
Alvarado v. Dart Container Corporation of California Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
25
2014
When 30 Days Just Isn’t Enough: The Ninth Circuit Rules that Defendants’ Right to Remove May Not be Limited to 30 Days Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
17
2019
Ding Dong the CCPA Private Right of Action is (Mostly) Dead! Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2015
Supreme Court Update – Hana Financial v. Hana Bank Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
12
2014
United States Supreme Court Holds That Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Extends to Employees of Private Companies Who Are Contractors or Subcontractors for Covered Public Companies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2020
DC Circuit Repudiates SEC Program for Testing Exchange Fee Structures Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2019
SCOTUS Rejects CMS DSH Policy, Calls CMS Guidance Practices Into Question Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
2
2020
High Risk of Second Requests in the Cannabis Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
16
2022
Ninth Circuit Grants Rehearing on California Law Banning Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
2
2016
Supreme Court Holds Rejected Rule 68 Offer of Judgment Does Not Moot Class Action Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
13
2020
Maybe the FTC Can’t Take That to the Bank: The Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. SEC and Its Implications for the FTC’s Ability to Seek Equitable Monetary Relief Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2014
Seventh Circuit Affirms Lodestar Method to Determine Attorneys’ Fees in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Class Action Settlement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins