May 21, 2012

Big Changes Coming to the Internet’s Domain Name System

After years of discussion, debate and deliberation, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) recently approved a plan that will facilitate one of the biggest changes the Internet Domain Name System has faced to date. The ICANN plan will allow private and public sector entities and organizations to obtain their own generic top-level domain name (gTLD) registries, and the plan will drastically increase the number of available gTLDS from the currently available 22 gTLDS – which include .com, .org and .net – to hundreds if not thousands of gTLDs. This week at the ICANN meeting in Dakar, Senegal, final implementation plans are being made in anticipation of ICANN’s official launch of the program in January 2012. gTLDs can be composed of nearly any word in any language, so businesses, governments and cities, among others around the world, are likely to seize the opportunity to have their own gTLD registry for the purpose of advancing their brands, products, services and causes.

This fundamental change in the Internet Domain Name System will impact the way consumers and businesses alike locate information on the Internet. Moreover, businesses must address new plans and ideas to structure and expand their online presence. There are expectations that as many as 1,000 new gTLD registries will be added to the gTLD list, which will also undoubtedly lead to the registration of millions of new domain names in these registries. Particular industries and causes have preemptively shown interest in certain gTLD’s, including .sport, .bank, .hotel, .eco, and .gay, and many brand owners will be applying to obtain registries comprised of their own key brands, e.g., .yourbrand. Importantly, ICANN has also implemented a challenge system for brand owners whose brands are incorporated into the proposed gTLD’s of third-party applicants, and ICANN will engage in an auction process for particular registries if multiple parties have legitimate competing interests.

ICANN has issued a robust Applicant Guidebook (it’s nearly 400 pages), which outlines its application and challenge rules and includes a detailed explanation of the application procedure for any new gTLD. The Guidebook underwent seven significant revisions, incorporating more than 1,000 comments from the public in an effort to both address the concerns of interested parties and maintain the security, stability and resiliency of the Internet. ICANN will only accept applications for new gTLD registries for a 90 day period commencing on January 12, 2012 and concluding on April 12, 2012. The application is a fairly significant undertaking and, if interested, clients are advised to begin the application process as soon as possible. ICANN has determined that the application fee will be $185,000 per gTLD to deter parties without legitimate interests from attempting to acquire valuable gTLDs. ICANN officials also stated that the fee is necessary to recoup start-up costs associated with the new program and ensure that proper funding is in place for the ambitious program.

To date, it remains to be seen how the expansion of gTLDs, particularly to this degree, will be received by consumers or the marketplace. Of the 22 currently used gTLDs, .com, .org and .net certainly dominate the Internet, and acceptance of the remaining gTLDs has been fairly lackluster. Yet, given the significant complexity of the new system and ability to theoretically adopt an infinite number of gTLDs, this expansion to this degree is unlikely to mirror any previous expansions. Accordingly, brand owners face greater challenges with regard to trademark protection that will be caused by the availability of domain names comprised of their brands in hundreds if not thousands of new gTLD registries. In addition, businesses are cautioned to ensure that competitors are precluded from monopolizing what could be a cornerstone of their industry by adopting any number of gTLDs comprised of arguably generic or descriptive terms related to particular categories of products and services.
 

© 2012 Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP.

About the Author

Partner

Lee J. Eulgen has significant experience in intellectual property litigation, negotiation and counseling, including trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, trade dress, domain name, entertainment, unfair competition and privacy-related matters. In particular, Lee has firstchaired myriad intellectual property disputes, and he has handled numerous brand and technology- driven transactions, including sophisticated licensing transactions, as well as mergers, acquisitions, and asset transfers.

In addition, Lee is well versed in strategic global trademark...

312-269-8465

About the Author

Partner

Antony J. McShane focuses his practice in the area of intellectual property counseling and litigation, concentrating on strategic development, protection and enforcement of trademarks, trade dress copyrights and trade secrets and patents.

Tony has represented Fortune 500 companies, emerging technology companies and Internet start-ups in federal and state courts throughout the country, and before administrative tribunals such as the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and the International Trade Commission. Representations include a variety of intellectual...

312-269-8486

Contributors

Associate

Katherine Dennis Nye focuses her practice on trademark policing and litigation. Kate also counsels clients regarding the clearance, acquisition, protection, and licensing of intellectual property, as well as regarding advertising, sweepstakes, and social media policies.

While in law school, Kate participated in the Child Advocacy Legal Clinic, where she represented children, parents, and foster parents in juvenile court child protection proceedings. She continues to represent children in contested guardianship proceedings as a pro bono Guardian ad Litem...

312-827-1455

About the Author

Partner

Sarah E. Smith counsels clients on a wide variety of intellectual property matters, including trademark, trade dress, domain name, copyright and trade secret issues. Sarah has extensive experience in developing and implementing domain name registration and Internet monitoring and enforcement programs, and has assisted clients in reclaiming scores of domain names through negotiation, litigation and arbitration proceedings under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy. Sarah also has substantial trademark licensing and associated transactional experience, and frequently advises...

312-269-5257

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.