May 21, 2012

Budget Deliberations Silent on Medicare or Other Entitlements

 

True fiscal hawks likely won’t find much to celebrate in this week’s budget machinations, talk of spending cuts aside. That’s because neither President Obama nor Congressional Republicans have much to say about cutting the entitlement programs that are driving the nation’s long-term debt problems.

The 2012 budgetary blueprint the President delivered Monday pledges to reduce deficits by $1.1 trillion over the next decade, with roughly two-thirds of that savings coming from domestic programs. House Republicans are focused on trying to squeeze $60 billion in cuts from this year’s budget, which has lurched forward only through a continuing resolution.

But the silence is deafening regarding Social Security, Medicaid and especially Medicare, which represent most of the big dollars responsible for the nation’s fiscal crisis. That silence is galling to some members of last year’s “take your medicine” deficit commission, especially silver-tongued former GOP Sen. Alan Simpson of Wyoming.

“I’m waiting for the politician to get up and say, ‘There’s only one way to do this: You dig into the big four – Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and defense,’ ” Simpson said. “And anybody giving you anything different from that, you want to walk out the door, stick your finger down your throat, and give them the green weenie.”

The challenges of dealing with Medicare costs were detailed by the Center last November in a piece entitled, “Medicare: An Entitlement Out of Control.” The story noted that the government health care program is utterly unsustainable, but politically untouchable.

Read the piece here.

Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Managing Editor

Gordon Witkin joined the Center in September 2008 following a long career at U.S. News & World Report and a shorter stint at Congressional Quarterly. At U.S. News, Witkin served as a regional correspondent in Detroit and as bureau chief in Denver, before coming to Washington in 1987. 

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.