May 22, 2012

Connecticut Prohibits Discrimination Based on Gender Identity

Effective October 1, 2011, Connecticut employers with three or more employees will be prohibited from discriminating against an employee or applicant based on gender identity or expression. Connecticut lawmakers defined “Gender identity or expression” as “a person’s gender-related identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that gender-related identity, appearance or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with the person’s physiology or assigned sex at birth.” Evidence that may establish gender-related identity includes assertion of the gender-related identity by the individual, care or treatment of the gender-related identity, evidence that the gender-related identity is not being asserted for an improper purpose, medical history, or other evidence that the gender-related identity is a sincerely held element of a person’s core identity. It is clear that the law protects transgendered people who are not undergoing gender reassignment surgery, and who do not intend to do so, as well as those who have completed such surgery or who are in the process of doing so.

The new law adds gender identity or expression—a status also commonly referred to as “transgendered”—as a protected class, affording that class similar rights and remedies as other classes such as race and gender protected under Connecticut law. By doing so, Connecticut joins New Jersey and New York City, both of which prohibit gender identity discrimination.

The one notable exception to the new law’s prohibition of discrimination based on gender identity or expression is the exemption of religious corporations or entities “with respect to the employment of individuals to perform work connected with the carrying on by such corporation . . . of its activities, or with respect to matters of discipline, faith, internal organization or ecclesiastical rule, custom or law” established by the religious entity.

Connecticut-based employers are advised to add gender identity to their EEO policies and literature and to be sure to include gender identity issues in their EEO training, especially training for managers and supervisors. Other employers who have employees in Connecticut (or New Jersey or New York City) should consider revising their policies companywide to include nondiscrimination based on gender identity and to include the new law’s requirements in their training.

© 2012 Vedder Price

About the Author

Shareholder

Chair, Labor and Employment Law Practice, New York Office

Alan M. Koral is a Vedder Price shareholder and heads the firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Area in the New York office. He represents and counsels corporations with respect to litigation matters, administrative hearings and investigations, as well as general employment law.

Mr. Koral has written and lectured extensively on labor and employment law matters. He has written numerous articles and is the author of two books, Conducting the Lawful Employment Interview (...

212-407-7750

About the Author

Associate

Michelle D. Velásquez is an Associate with Vedder Price P.C. and a member of the Litigation and Labor and Employment practice areas. Ms. Velásquez represents clients in a wide variety of commercial and business disputes including commercial torts, employment, bankruptcy, securities and breach of contract.

212-407-7792

Contributors

Shareholder

Laura Sack is a shareholder at Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Area. For more than 17 years, Ms. Sack’s practice has been devoted exclusively to representing management in labor and employment law matters. Her practice currently includes litigating employment cases before state and federal courts, representing clients before administrative agencies, designing and conducting employee training programs, and counseling management on labor and employment law issues.

212-407-6960

About the Author

Shareholder

Michael Goettig joined Vedder Price’s New York office in 2007. An associate in the Litigation and Labor and Employment Practice Areas, Mr. Goettig represents clients on matters ranging from employee benefit plans and collective bargaining agreements to corporate contract disputes and general litigation matters.

212-407-7781

About the Author

Shareholder

Lyle S. Zuckerman is a shareholder at Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Area. For over 12 years, he has represented management in all disciplines of labor and employment law.

Mr. Zuckerman’s expertise includes traditional labor law (grievance arbitration, NLRB proceedings, secondary boycotts and work stoppages, union organizing campaigns and contract negotiations) as well as the full-range of employment law matters. In this regard, Mr. Zuckerman defends employment discrimination and breach of contract...

212-407-6964

About the Author

Associate

Roy P. Salins joined Vedder Price’s Labor and Employment Practice Area in January 2009.

Since graduating from law school in 2001, Mr. Salins has concentrated solely on the practice of labor and employment law.  Mr. Salins’s practice includes all aspects of litigation in federal and state courts, administrative agencies and in arbitrations before FINRA and the AAA.  Mr. Salins also devotes a large part of his practice to counseling clients in all areas of labor and employment law, compliance with federal and state nondiscrimination and wage...

212-407-6965

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.