July 26, 2014

Contraceptive Mandate Appeal Held in Abeyance Pending Issuance of Final Rule

The D.C. Circuit Court ruled that lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) should be held in abeyance until the Department of Health and Human Services issues its final rules regarding the applicability of the mandate to private employers. See Wheaton College v. Sebelius, No. 12-5273 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 18, 2012). In their July 2010 Interim Final Rule, the government issued regulations under ACA, 42 U.S.C. § 300gg-13(a)(4), requiring group health plans and health insurance issuers, unless grandfathered or otherwise exempt, to cover “preventive care and screening[s]” for women in accordance with guidelines to be promulgated by appellee Department of Health and Human Services at a later date. Id. at 1 (citing 75 Fed. Reg. 41,726, 41,728 (July 19, 2010)). On August 1, 2011, the Department issued those guidelines, which require plans to cover all “FDA approved contraceptive[s].” See 77 Fed. Reg. 8725, 8725 (Feb. 15, 2012). An amended Interim Final Rule authorized an exemption for certain organizations with religious objections to contraception, but the exemption does not extend to the appellant religious colleges in these cases. 76 Fed. Reg. 46,621, 46,623 (Aug. 3, 2011). Religious colleges filed suit challenging the requirement that they provide contraceptive services.    

At oral argument, the government represented that it would never enforce the contraceptive mandate against the appellants or those like them and that it would publish a new final rule before August 2013. Finding that the government’s representations that a final rule may render the appeal moot, the D.C. Circuit agreed to hold the appeal in abeyance pending the issuance of the new final rule. As such, the D.C. Circuit has not issued any ruling regarding the applicability of the contraceptive mandate to religious and non-profit entities.

For a copy of the order, click here.

©2002-2013 Fowler White Boggs P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

About the Author


Scott Richards handles admiralty/maritime matters, complex commercial litigation, construction litigation, health law litigation, and class action litigation, in state and federal courts.  Scott's admiralty practice has allowed him to work on maritime lien foreclosures, OPA issues, vessel sales, stowaway issues, and vessel insurance disputes.  With a civil engineering background and licensure, he spent several years working as a geotechnical lab technician and geotechnical engineer, thereby becoming intimately familiar with the practice and developing an understanding that...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.