May 22, 2012

Department of Transportation Prohibits Drivers of Commercial Vehicles From Texting While Driving

Poyner Spruill

The U.S. Department of Transportation recently issued a Regulatory Guidance making it clear that drivers of commercial vehicles covered by DOT regulations are prohibited from texting while driving. DOT regulations apply to commercial vehicles such as trucks or buses that are used on highways in interstate commerce and weigh more than 10,000 pounds or carry more than 8 passengers.

The Regulatory Guidance interprets existing DOT regulations governing the use of equipment and accessories onboard commercial vehicles to impose this new prohibition on the grounds that texting while driving decreases the safety of operating a commercial vehicle. “Texting” is defined as “the review of, or preparation and transmission of, typed messages through any device, or engaging in any form of electronic data retrieval or electronic data communication through any such device.” Under the new prohibition, truck and bus drivers who text while driving commercial vehicles may be subject to civil or criminal penalties of up to $2,750.

To justify the ban, the Regulatory Guidance cites a research study by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) showing that drivers who send and receive text messages take their eyes off the road for an average of 4.6 seconds out of every 6 seconds while texting. At 55 miles per hour, this means that the driver is traveling the length of a football field, including the end zones, without looking at the road. The FMCSA research also shows that drivers who text while driving are more than 20 times more likely to get into an accident than nondistracted drivers.

This Regulatory Guidance is the latest in a series of actions by the federal government to reduce distracted driving following a national summit last year to focus attention on the problem. President Obama issued an Executive Order at the end of 2009 banning federal employees from texting while driving government-owned vehicles. The Regulatory Guidance states that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration will issue more specific and comprehensive regulations to address the problem of texting while driving a commercial vehicle in an expedited rulemaking procedure later this year.

The DOT’s prohibition against texting while driving does not apply to onboard dispatching systems that transmit directions or instructions to truck or bus drivers by text message, as long as drivers are not required to read or type messages while driving. Most of these systems cannot be used while a commercial vehicle is in motion.

The new prohibition also does not prohibit the use of cell phones while driving for purposes other than texting. However, the Regulatory Guidance reminds drivers of commercial vehicles that existing DOT regulations require them to comply with the laws and regulations of any state in which the vehicles are being operated. Some states prohibit any non-emergency use of a cell phone while driving.

Many states, including North Carolina, have laws against texting while driving. North Carolina’s law prohibiting texting while driving for anyone operating a motor vehicle became effective December 1, 2009.

As we noted in a recent Employer Alert on the new North Carolina law, employers concerned about employee safety, compliance with the law, and potential civil liability from motor vehicle accidents should consider having a comprehensive written policy governing employee use of cell phones and other communication devices while driving a company vehicle or during any other driving on the job. See Employers Should Have Written Policy for Employee Mobile Phone Usage While Operating a Motor Vehicle.
 

© 2012 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

David practices in the area of employment litigation.  He regularly advises and defends clients in race, age, disability and sex discrimination and harassment cases; reviews handbooks and termination issues; and provides compliance advice on matters of employment law.

Representative Experience

McNeil v. Scotland County - Obtained summary judgment for employer where plaintiff alleged race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Successfully...

919-783-2854
Partner

Louis has over 20 years of experience in cases for companies and individuals involving non-compete covenants, trade secrets and other matters associated with departing employees. He has obtained restraining orders and injunctions in numerous cases to prevent departing employees from violating non-compete agreements, diverting customer relationships and misappropriating trade secrets. Louis advises clients on using non-compete covenants in employment contracts and other business agreements, as well as a wide variety of other strategies for protection of key employees, customer relationships...

919-783-2810

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.