May 23, 2012

DOE Publishes Proposed Revisions to Export Control Regulations

Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published proposed changes to its export control regulations in 10 C.F.R. Part 810-the first substantive changes to Part 810 since 1986. The current Part 810 regulations are remnants of the Cold War and are generally viewed as burdensome and difficult to implement from both the applicant's and DOE's perspective. Among others, the proposed changes will affect companies that employ or host visits from foreign nationals or that are involved with nuclear-related work overseas. Nuclear industry vendors also may be affected.By way of background, Part 810 regulates the export of certain nonpublic, nuclear-related technology and information. Part 810 covers most of the nuclear fuel cycle, from chemical conversion of uranium after it is milled to storage of irradiated materials and processing of high-level waste. For a commercial nuclear power plant, Part 810 typically covers the nuclear island but not the "balance-of-plant"; the latter is typically under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC).

The most significant change is DOE's rewrite of the provisions regarding which export activities require DOE's prior approval (i.e., activities that require a "specific authorization") and which export activities do not (i.e., activities that require only a "general authorization"). The existing rules focus on activities that require a specific authorization and provide a list of countries to which exports are prohibited without such authorization. DOE's proposed rules identify and clarify those activities that are generally authorized under Part 810, and replace the current list of prohibited countries in 10 C.F.R. § 810.8(a) with a list of countries to which exports are generally authorized.

Another significant change is the addition of provisions to regulate "deemed exports." DOE has always regulated transfers of certain nuclear-related information to foreign nationals inside the United States as if they were exports of technology to the foreign national's country of origin (i.e., they are "deemed" to be exported to the recipient's home country). But Part 810 has been silent on this issue. The proposed rules codify for the first time what DOE expects to be included in a deemed export application.

There are many other changes that affect nuclear-related exports, or sharing such information with foreign nationals inside the United States.

DOE is accepting comments on the proposed rules until November 7, 2011. Affected companies should evaluate the proposed rules' potential affect on their export practices and decide whether they have concerns that would justify submitting comments as part of the rulemaking process. Morgan Lewis can facilitate that process.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Alex Polonsky is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Energy Practice, focusing on energy and environmental law. His energy practice includes advising on all aspects of U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing and litigation, including license renewal, power uprates, license transfers, decommissioning, enforcement proceedings, and whistleblower investigations. He is also an experienced litigator before the NRC's Atomic Safety and Licensing Boards (ASLBs). Some of the cases he has defended in litigation before ASLBs include the construction application for a mixed-oxide fuel...

202-739-5830

About the Author

Associate

Esther K. Park is an associate in Morgan Lewis’s Energy Practice. Ms. Park assists with the representation of electric utilities and other clients in the nuclear industry on a variety of regulatory and litigation matters before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), other agencies, and the federal courts. She also advises on NRC licensing and enforcement proceedings, nuclear safety and regulatory compliance, employment discrimination, and related matters.

202-739-5720

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.