May 23, 2012

DOL Releases Final 408(b)(2) Disclosure Regulation

Final regulation on required disclosures by plan service providers extends deadline for disclosures to July 1, 2012.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has now released the "final" version of its final regulation on required disclosures by plan service providers under the statutory prohibited transaction exemption provided by Section 408(b)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). It replaces the interim final regulation that was published in July 2010.[1]

The deadline for providing the required disclosures was extended by three months to July 1, 2012. This will provide needed time for service providers to complete their disclosure documents in a form consistent with the finalized regulation, which differs in several respects from the interim final regulation. Because the date by which the participant-level disclosures for participant-directed plans must be provided is tied to the Section 408(b)(2) disclosure effective date, that date is now extended to August 30, 2012, with the first quarterly statements under the rules for calendar-year plans due by November 14, 2012.

One of the issues left open after the release of the interim final regulation was whether DOL would require a specific format for the disclosure. The final regulation reserves a place for the future development of such provisions, which are now the subject of a separate proposed rulemaking that DOL anticipates will come out this summer. DOL did include with the final regulation an appendix with a form of a "sample guide to initial disclosures," which DOL is encouraging service providers to use to assist plan fiduciaries with their review of the required disclosures.

We are planning to issue a second LawFlash on the final regulation that provides a more detailed analysis of the changes from the interim final regulation.

Service providers to "covered" plans—such as investment advisers, broker-dealers, banks, insurance companies, and recordkeepers—now have just under five months to determine whether they need to provide additional disclosures to their existing clients and, if so, to get those disclosures to their clients. They also will need to develop procedures to ensure that new clients receive the necessary disclosures, and that clients are updated on any changes to previously provided information. "Responsible" plan fiduciaries, such as plan committees and plan sponsors, should aim to develop, by July 1, processes and procedures for reviewing the disclosures that are received.


[1]. See "DOL Publishes Interim Final ERISA Regulation on Service Provider Disclosure Obligations" (July 21, 2010), available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/EB-LF_DOL-InterimFinalReg-ServiceProviderDisclosureObligations_21july10.pdf.

[2]. See "Extension of Applicability Dates for New ERISA Disclosure Rules" (July 18, 2011), available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/EB_LF_ExtensionOfApplicability DatesERISARules_18july11.pdf; "DOL Releases Final Disclosure Regulations for Participant-Directed Individual Account Plans" (Oct. 26, 2010), available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/ EB_LF_FinalDisclosureIndividualAccountPlans_26oct10.pdf; "DOL Publishes Interim Final ERISA Regulation on Service Provider Disclosure Obligations" (July 21, 2010), available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/EB-LF_DOL-InterimFinalReg-ServiceProviderDisclosureObligations_21july10.pdf; and "Service Providers to ERISA Plans: DOL's New Disclosure Regulations Are Imminent-Are You Ready?" (Nov. 8, 2011), available online at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/EB_LF_ServiceProviderstoERISAPlans_08nov11.pdf.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Michael B. Richman is of counsel in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice. In addition to employee benefits, Mr. Richman's practice includes the investment management and securities areas. His principal focus is on matters under the ERISA fiduciary responsibility rules. These have included fiduciary governance of ERISA plans, prohibited transaction issues in proposed transactions and transactions under government investigation, and preparing requests to the U.S. Department of Labor for prohibited transaction exemptions and advisory opinions. Mr...

202-739-5036

About the Author

Partner

Donald J. Myers is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice. Mr. Myers focuses his practice on the fiduciary responsibility provisions of ERISA, and has experience counseling clients on related securities, banking, and insurance issues. He also works with financial institutions in structuring investments for pension plans. As a former government official, he is familiar with government practices and procedures and regularly represents clients before government agencies such as the Department of Labor, the Pension Benefit Guaranty...

202-739-5666

Contributors

Partner

Daniel R. Kleinman is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Investment Management and Securities Industry Practice and a member of the ERISA Fiduciary Services Group. Mr. Kleinman's practice focuses on the fiduciary responsibilities provisions (Title I) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the related tax, corporate and securities laws in connection with the structuring and marketing of investment products (including private equity and hedge funds) and financial services to employee benefit plans. He also handles issues with respect to the regulation of broker-dealers...

202-739-5143

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.