May 23, 2012

EEOC Sues Delia*s for Pregnancy Discrimination

Retailer Harassed and Terminated Pregnant Employees, Federal Agency Charges

ALLENTOWN, Penn.– dELiA*s Inc., one of the fastest growing specialty retailers in America, harassed two employees, forced one to take maternity leave early, and fired the other employee because she was pregnant and in retaliation for her complaint about the unlawful discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it announced today.  

The EEOC alleges that Nicole Young, a fashion representative, and Mallory Martin, co-manager, at dELiA*s store in Lehigh Valley Mall in Whitehall, Penn., were repeatedly harassed by management after they told company managers about their respective pregnancies.  The harassment included constantly questioning them about their ability to do their jobs, and requiring Young to obtain medical documentation showing that she could perform her job duties.  

Martin complained to the district manager and Young complained to the company’s hotline about the pregnancy harassment.  Instead of stopping the harassment, the company illegally retaliated against Young when it terminated her, and caused Martin to take early maternity leave, the EEOC says in the lawsuit.  

Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 prohibits discrimination based on sex, including pregnancy, and makes it unlawful for an employer to retaliate against an employee for complaining about discrimination.  The EEOC first attempted to reach a pre-litigation settlement before filing suit in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Civil Action No. 11-5979,   In its lawsuit, the EEOC seeks injunctive relief prohibiting discriminatory employment practices based on sex, pregnancy or retaliation, as well as lost wages, compensatory and punitive damages and other affirmative relief for Young and Martin.

“It is unfortunate that more than 33 years after the passage of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, too many employers still react wrongly when they learn about an employee’s pregnancy,” said EEOC District Director Spencer H. Lewis, Jr.  “The law is clear—an employer cannot either force a pregnant woman who is able to do her job into taking early maternity leave or fire her because of her pregnancy.”  

“No woman should be forced to choose between motherhood and earning a living, ” added regional attorney Debra Lawrence of the EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office, which oversees Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware, Maryland, and parts of New Jersey and Ohio.  “Nor should an employee fear that complaining about illegal conditions will cost her her job.  This lawsuit should remind all employers that if they violate federal law, the EEOC will take strong action to protect the rights of pregnant workers.”

According to its website, www.dELiAs.com, dELiA*s, a lifestyle company primarily targeting customers ages 12 to 19, has more than 100 stores in 34 states, including five in Pennsylvania.

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.