May 23, 2012

EEOC Sues Illinois Temp Agency For Disability Discrimination

Federal Agency Says JES Personnel / Genie Temporary Service Fired Employee Because of His Epilepsy

CHICAGO  – JES Personnel Consultants, Inc., doing business as Genie Temporary Service,  violated federal disability discrimination law by refusing to allow an employee  to return to work because of his epilepsy, the U.S. Equal Employment  Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit it filed today. Genie is a temporary service agency with an  office in LaSalle, Ill., that supplies employees to various client  employers.

John Rowe,  director of the EEOC’s Chicago District, said that the agency’s pre-suit  investigation indicated that Genie had placed the employee with Clover Technologies Group, LLC, where he unpacked and sorted ink cartridges. After he had a brief epileptic seizure on his  first day of work, according to Rowe, Clover allowed him to work the rest of  the day, but asked him to provide a note from his doctor authorizing him to  return to work after that. The EEOC said  that the employee provided the note to Genie the next day, and Genie neither  advised him that the note was inadequate nor forwarded the note to Clover, but  the employee was not permitted to return and was effectively terminated.

Such  alleged conduct violates the Americans With  Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits disability discrimination in  employment. The EEOC filed suit after  first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation  process. The case, EEOC v. JES Personnel Consultants, Inc. d/b/a Genie Temporary Serivce, Civil  Action No. 11 CV 5117, was filed today in U.S. District Court for the Northern  District of Illinois, Eastern Division and has been assigned to U.S. District  Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer. The  government’s litigation effort will be led by EEOC Trial Attorney Gordon  Waldron and Supervisory Trial Attorney Gregory Gochanour.

“Temp  agencies and other employment agencies play an important role as gatekeepers to  employment opportunities throughout our economy,” said John Hendrickson, the  EEOC’s regional attorney in Chicago. “They have an obligation under federal law to  give fair consideration to qualified people with disabilities when making  placement decisions.”

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.