May 23, 2012

EPA Reminds Republicans Cap-and-Trade Used to be GOP Idea — and it Worked for Acid Rain

The Obama administration is turning the tables on Republican foes of climate regulation, demonstrating not only that cap-and-trade works — it significantly reduced acid rain — but that the program was started by one of their own, George H. W. Bush.

A 1990 revision of the Clean Air Act shepherded by the first President Bush imposed overall emission caps on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, the primary pollutants contributing to acid rain, and then let industries trade allowances to meet their business needs.

The program has been extremely successful, the Environmental Protection Agency reported on December 20th. Power plants decreased emissions of sulfur dioxide to 5.7 million tons in 2009, a 64 percent drop from 1990 levels and well below the targeted cuts envisioned when the law was passed and then implemented starting in 1995.

The agency added that the law had saved $120 billion in pollution and health costs, about 40 times the estimated cost.

“The program’s success has demonstrated that market-based trading systems can cost-effectively reduce pollution and address environmental damage,” the EPA declared in a report released just a few short weeks before Republicans who oppose a similar cap-and-trade scheme for greenhouse gases take control of the House.

The administration is bracing for an onslaught of attacks by conservative climate science critics and industries who oppose the EPA’s plan to regulate greenhouse gases from large emitters starting in January.

Critics, including Democrats such as West Virginia Sens. Jay Rockefeller and Joe Manchin, argue the new regulations could put American energy producers at a disadvantage and hurt the economic recovery. Rockefeller is proposing the rules be delayed by two years but his plan has yet to get a vote in the Senate.

The EPA’s report, however, gives ammunition to supporters of greenhouse gas regulations, who now can argue that companies face little harm and the environment benefits from caps on pollution when combined with allowances for trading. The report also reminds Americans that the idea of cap-and-trade originated with Republicans during the elder Bush’s years and was passed overwhelmingly by Congress.

The full report can be viewed here.

Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Chief Digital Officer

Award-winning investigative journalist John Solomon joined the Center for Public Integrity in March 2010,. During his quarter-century career in print and broadcast media, Solomon has covered a variety of issues, from the convicted serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer to an in-depth look at teachers who returned to classrooms after child molestation convictions. In 2008 Solomon joined The Washington Times as executive editor.  Under his leadership, the paper won the Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award in 2008 and the Society of Professional Journalists’ 2009 National Public...

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.