May 23, 2012

Health Care Fraud Cases Drop Despite Bigger Budget

The official line at the Department of Justice is that investigators are battling Medicare and Medicaid fraud like never before. But the most recent data on the agency’s activities show that its efforts and ballooning budget have actually produced fewer results.

Despite a more than $200 million increase in funding in 2009, DOJ criminal convictions for health care fraud dropped slightly to 583 compared to 588 in 2008. These figures were included in a stinging letter from Iowa Senator Charles Grassley to Attorney General Eric Holder and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. According to the letter, criminal prosecutions for health care fraud flat-lined during the same period, and the number of agency criminal health care fraud cases filed dropped by 21 to 481.

The Bush and Obama administrations both pushed money to the Department of Justice to ramp up their efforts at fighting health care crooks. Fraud and abuse has long hobbled the Medicare program, by some estimates siphoning off as much as 20 percent of the program’s budget.

In response, Holder and Sebelius in 2009 announced the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Teams (HEAT) initiative, an expanded interagency taskforce that sifts through data to identify medical fraud hotspots. The HEAT initiative received good press, with high profile busts and strike teams operating in Southern Florida, Southern California, Detroit, Brooklyn, and other cities. But Grassley, citing DOJ data, found the results of the program wanting when considered as part of the agency’s overall efforts to dig out fraud.

Although the HEAT teams filed 82 criminal investigations in 2009, up from 30 a year before, that increase did not translate to more DOJ criminal cases filed overall.

“This raises a question of whether the focus of the HEAT initiative is actually redirecting resources away from overall criminal enforcement of health care laws,” Grassley wrote in the letter, which asked for more detailed data on the agencies’ efforts. “While this may be a statistical anomaly, it is clear that despite the HEAT initiative, criminal cases for health care fraud remain virtually unchanged since the initiative began.”

Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Staff Writer

Before he joined the Center’s staff in 2008, Joe Eaton was a staff writer at Washington City Paper and a reporter at The Roanoke Times. He has written for Salon.com, USA Today, and The (Baltimore) Sun. Eaton graduated from the University of Michigan with a bachelor’s degree in English and earned a master’s degree in journalism from the University of Maryland.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.