May 23, 2012

Here We Go Again – DOJ Investigating ICD Implants

If you were involved with a kyphoplasty audit, this may sound familiar. A number of hospitals and health systems have recently been served with subpoenas by the United States Department of Justice regarding Medicare billing for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (“ICDs”). The DOJ is investigating whether hospitals billed Medicare for ICDs for patients who did not satisfy coverage National Coverage Determination criteria. For example, NCD criteria provides that Medicare does not cover implantation of ICDs in patients who lack a history of arrhythmia, even if their heart function indicates that they are at an elevated risk of sudden death due to arrhythmia, if the implantation occurred within 40 days of an acute myocardial infraction or within three months of a bypass surgery or angioplasty. The DOJ also is investigating the three largest ICD manufacturers regarding their communication with providers regarding Medicare billing – much like the DOJ’s past investigation of Kyphon as part of their kyphoplasty investigation.

The National Coverage Determination criteria can be found in the NCD Manual Section 20.4.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.