Advertisement

May 21, 2013

Honesty Is the Best Policy (Along with Documentation) - Reporting Injuries From Nursing Home Falls

A quick Internet search reveals that the old adage, “honesty is the best policy,” is attributed to numerous sources. When it comes to reporting injuries from nursing home falls, however, it’s clear that Congress turned that policy into law. An Ohio lawsuit is now garnering national attention because the family of a nursing home resident alleges the facility failed to follow such law not once or twice, but 16 times.

The Lawsuit

According to the lawsuit, 83-year-old Gladys Feran, suffering from dementia, was a resident at Cleveland’s Larchwood Village Retirement Community. In April 2009, Feran fell and broke her pelvis. She died two weeks later. Her family alleges that the cause of death was “blunt impact to trunk with fracture of pelvis.”

As with any lawsuit, the family, in order to prevail, must establish that the facility was negligent. That is, the family must prove the facility failed to take reasonable steps to prevent Feran’s accident. The facility’s policies, Feran’s care plan and the training of the facility’s staff will all be fair game for the jury to examine.

What makes this case so different from other cases, though, is that Feran had fallen at least 16 times during her 17-month stay at Larchwood. Feran’s family claims they were not notified of any of these falls, and that they only learned of them once Feran was transported to the hospital after her final fall. In attempting to discover what had happened, the family learned that at least two earlier falls occurred when Feran, at the facility’s direction, was pushing other residents in wheelchairs. Feran had also suffered a fractured clavicle and hip in prior falls.

In the lawsuit, the family will want to use the facility’s failure to report the prior falls in an effort to persuade the jury that the facility was negligent. The facility, however, contends such evidence should be reserved for a separate trial on punitive damages. In other words, the facility believes the jury should focus only on the specific events that may have contributed to Feran’s final fall. Only if the jury finds that the facility was negligent could it then consider past events and failures. Splitting the trial in such a manner is common in cases involving significant damages, and whether such a split should occur in Feran’s case has now reached the Ohio Supreme Court. It may therefore be months, or even years, before the case goes to trial.

Lessons Learned

It is estimated that each year, a nursing home with 100 beds will report 100-200 falls. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, up to 20 percent of these falls result in serious injuries. Given the frequency of such falls, and their severity, nursing home facilities will have a number of opportunities to notify family members of a resident’s change in condition.

In Ohio, Feran’s family contends that the facility, when faced with such opportunities, engaged instead in an effort to conceal the accidents. The facility of course denies such a cover-up, but why allow your facility to be in such a position to begin with? A lawsuit over a fall may well be unavoidable, but following protocol when it comes to reporting will dispel any allegation of a cover-up and greatly reduce the risk that a case involving your facility will wind up in national headlines. Of course, all notifications should be documented in the resident’s file, so as to avoid a he-said, she-said dispute. This is also occurring in the Feran case, as the facility claims it did notify the family of a prior fall. Honesty and documentation are indeed the best policies.
 

© 2013 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Josh’s practice is devoted entirely to litigation and trial work arising from commercial transactions.  As part of his practice, Josh regularly represents businesses that are involved in disputes concerning breaches of contract, unfair trade practices, misappropriation of trade secrets, and breaches of covenants not to compete.  These include banking institutions in workout situations, collections actions, and lender liability claims, as well as construction clients involved in non-payment and building defect situations.  Josh also has substantial experience...

704-342-5284

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.