May 24, 2012

Housing Crisis to Deepen? Millions More Homes at 'Imminent Risk of Default' Study Says

Worst may be yet to come in foreclosure crisis, study says -Economy still paying price for collapse of housing boom

Four years after the housing market collapse triggered a wave of defaults, the worst may be yet to come for homeowners, according to a new study.

Among mortgages made between 2004 and 2008, 2.7 million households ended up in foreclosure while 3.6 million more are at “immediate, serious risk” of default, according to the study, released by the Center for Responsible Lending Thursday.

Minorities are particularly at risk, according to the study. Although the majority of borrowers who have lost their homes or who are seriously delinquent are white, foreclosure rates for minority borrowers are twice as high.

Approximately one quarter of all black and Hispanic borrowers are in trouble compared with about 12 percent of white borrowers.

These disparities cannot be explained away by income. Ten percent of higher-income African-American borrowers and 15 percent of higher-income Hispanic borrowers have lost their homes to foreclosure, compared with 4.6 percent of higher-income white borrowers.

Minority borrowers were also much more likely to receive high-cost, subprime loans than other borrowers, even those with similarly good credit histories. For example, among borrowers with a credit score of more than 660, black and Hispanic borrowers received a high-interest-rate loan more than three times as often as white borrowers.

The study – “Lost Ground, 2011: Disparities in Mortgage Lending and Foreclosures” – concludes with a plea for stronger government measures to prevent foreclosures and to reform the lending market in ways that don’t close doors for low-income and minority borrowers.

To prevent a future crisis, “we must not create an environment where qualified borrowers are denied access to reasonably priced mortgages,” the study reads.

The analysis doesn’t include all troubled loans. Those outside the narrow four-year time frame are excluded, as are others that are in trouble but not in imminent risk of failure.

Other estimates have put the number of loans in foreclosure or more than 90 days delinquent at about five million.

The Center for Responsible Lending is a consumer-focused nonprofit advocacy group.

Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Staff Writer

Benjamin Hallman covers business and finance for the Center. He joined in June 2010 after nearly five years as a legal affairs reporter at The American Lawyer, where he covered the business of law, white collar crime, and regulatory Washington. Hallman has reported on the accounting fraud prosecutions of HealthSouth’s Richard Scrushy and Qwest’s Joesph Nacchio; on the massive Google book search settlement; and, from Iraq, on American-led efforts to rebuild the Iraqi justice system. His story about the crash of Lehman Brothers was anthologized in The Best American Legal...

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.