May 24, 2012

IRS Could Save Millions Through E-Filing

Electronic filing of tax returns could save the Internal Revenue Service millions of dollars. The IRS currently spends $3.29 to process each paper tax return, while an electronic return costs a mere 19 cents.

In 2009, about two-thirds of tax returns were filed electronically. If the remaining paper returns had been e-filed, the IRS could have saved $148 million.

The 1998 IRS Reform Act established the goal of 80 percent of tax returns being filed electronically by 2007, which has since been extended until 2012. Starting this tax season, if a tax preparer files more than 10 individual income tax returns per year, it must be submitted electronically.

The Government Accountability Office found that the IRS may be missing opportunities to educate taxpayers about the benefits of e-filing. Aside from saving the IRS money, e-filing tends to be more accurate and allows for refunds to be processed quicker. If the IRS had more information available electronically, its compliance programs would improve and bring in additional enforcement revenue.

“Opportunities may exist to reduce costs by investigating potential for eliminating duplication, and to increase e-filing rates by educating taxpayers about the benefits of e-filing,” the GAO report said.

FAST FACT: Shifting staff from paper return processing to compliance programs could increase tax revenue collected by $175 million annually.

Following are other new watchdog reports released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), various federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG), and other government entities.

MISC.

  • A Bureau of Land Management manager failed to disclose regular meetings with a Wyoming businessman, which included dinners and lunches over a 12-year period, during which the manager was considering a land exchange which would have benefited the company. The employee may have violated conflicts of interest laws, but the report did not reveal the final ruling. (DOI Inspector General)
Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.