Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Joshua Wright: FTC Nominee May Raise the Bar for Antitrust Challenges

Economist's emphasis on empirical evidence and economic theory stands in contrast to outgoing Commissioner Rosch's more litigation-oriented approach.

President Barack Obama has nominated Joshua Wright to serve a seven-year term on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC or the Commission). Wright would replace Commissioner J. Thomas Rosch, whose term will expire at the end of September. Although both Wright and Rosch are Republicans, the change in the composition of the Commission could affect the number and type of enforcement actions that the FTC initiates.

Wright, who is a professor at George Mason University School of Law, holds both a Ph.D. in economics and a J.D. As an economist, he has been identified as a member of the "Chicago School." Chicago School economists believe that over-enforcement of the antitrust laws can do the economy more harm than good and therefore the government should only initiate an enforcement action when anticompetitive effects are clear. Wright (who would be the only economist on the Commission) has questioned the wisdom of some of the FTC's ongoing investigations and has criticized what he views as overly aggressive antitrust enforcement through hastily pursued actions against dominant companies. As a Commissioner, he is likely to encourage greater emphasis on empirical evidence and economic theory prior to bringing an enforcement action.

Wright's approach is likely to be in stark contrast to that of outgoing Commissioner Rosch, who has often been willing (along with the three Democrats on the Commission) to support the filing of enforcement actions in close cases. Commissioner Rosch's reputation as an aggressive enforcer grew from his 40 years of experience as a litigator and trial lawyer. This experience has led him to focus on practical issues, such as the likelihood that the Commission would prevail in litigation, and has provided a unique perspective on the appropriate enforcement role for the FTC. During his term on the Commission, he openly favored (1) short pre-complaint investigations; (2) a relaxed view of the Commission's "reason to believe that a violation of the law has occurred" standard for filing an initial complaint; (3) compressed, post-complaint administrative litigation timelines; and (4) wide deference to the Commission to determine the ultimate outcome of enforcement actions as an expert antitrust body.

Wright must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. A confirmation vote is unlikely before the election in November.

Copyright © 2013 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Jonathan M. Rich is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Antitrust Practice. Mr. Rich's practice includes litigation and representation before the federal enforcement agencies, including grand jury investigations, mergers and acquisitions, and other civil investigations. His practice focuses on antitrust matters in a variety of industries, with a particular focus on financial institutions. Both at Morgan Lewis and previously at the U.S. Department of Justice, Mr. Rich has been involved in all of the major government antitrust investigations of the financial...

202.739.5433

About the Author

Associate

Swati V. Rawani is an associate in Morgan Lewis’s Antitrust Practice. Ms. Rawani's practice spans a wide range of antitrust matters. She has represented clients before the Federal Trade Commission, the Department of Justice, and foreign competition authorities in merger investigations, criminal and civil cartel investigations, and other non-merger conduct investigations. Ms. Rawani has also represented clients in federal court antitrust litigation, including complex class action proceedings.

202.739.5851

Contributors

Partner

Thomas J. Lang is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Antitrust Practice. Mr. Lang focuses his practice on antitrust litigation and merger reviews. His litigation experience includes class actions, price fixing, predatory pricing, intellectual-property-related antitrust issues, monopolization, state court indirect purchaser litigation, federal multidistrict litigation, and civil and criminal investigations by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

From 2006 to 2008, Mr. Lang served as Senior Litigation Counsel in the FTC's Bureau of Competition. In this...

202.739.5609

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.