May 24, 2012

Mid-Level Providers May Now Order Respiratory Therapy in Hospitals Under State Law

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services revised its Hospital Conditions of Participation this past summer to permit a qualified and licensed practitioner who is responsible for the care of the patient to order respiratory care, provided the practitioner is acting within his/her scope of practice under state law.  See 42 CFR 482.57(3).  The hospital’s medical staff must also authorize the practitioner to order respiratory care services.  See id.  Because of this revision, Medicare now allows nurse practitioners, physician assistants and others to order respiratory care without a physician’s countersignature if state law permits such practitioners to issue respiratory care orders.

Until January 28, 2011, however, Wisconsin law still required that a physician order all respiratory care services.  See Wis. Admin. Code DHS §124.22(4).  The physician may then delegate the task of ordering respiratory services to mid-levels, who then write the orders for the respiratory care, as long as a physician counter-signs the order.  See http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/rl_DSL/Hospital/frequentAskQs.pdf (question 30).

The DQA changed this discrepancy through the issuance of DQA Memo 11-004/Respiratory Therapy Orders in Hospitals, a statewide variance for DHS 124.22(4) to allow licensed practitioners, who are authorized via their practice act and are granted privileges by the medical staff of the hospital, to order respiratory care services. Effective immediately, this variance provides more flexibility for providers when it comes to respiratory care and can be found at http://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/rl_dsl/Publications/11-004.htm.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.