May 24, 2012

New Chief of House Financial Services Takes Aim At Derivatives

 

Spencer Bachus, the Alabama Republican expected to become the next chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, says he wants to tinker with the derivatives regulation required by the Dodd-Frank financial regulation law.

“There are lot of job-killing provisions in that [Dodd-Frank] bill and there is a lot of just new bureaucracies created,” Bachus said in an interview today on CNBC. “Putting all derivatives on exchanges is just one example of something that is going to dry up liquidity, that is going to impact the economy, and is going to cost jobs.”

The financial regulation bill signed into law in July requires the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, with some help from the Securities and Exchange Commission, to issue regulations policing the $615 trillion derivatives market and requiring standardized derivatives to be processed by central clearinghouses rather than individual traders. Derivatives are sophisticated financial instruments linked to an underlying asset such as a commodity, bond, stock, or currency.

Bachus was among the senior Republicans who took to the TV airwaves to discuss their plans for the U.S. House, which swung to GOP control in yesterday’s election. The new Congress is sworn in and begins work in January.

Bachus, a critic of the power Dodd-Frank gave to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to liquidate large non-bank financial services companies, acknowledged that any revisions to the law must win approval from the Democratic-led Senate. “We will take incremental steps, knowing that we’ve got to have bipartisan agreement in the Senate. There are a lot of things we can accomplish in a short time if we have some bipartisanship cooperation from moderate Democrats,” he said.

Reelected to his seventh term in the House, Bachus said he wants to diminish the role of the federal government in business.

“We’re the strongest economy in the world, but we got there by private ownership, by free markets, not by the government running the show and having a command and control economy. We got there, really, by having a lame government that stayed out of making decisions and we need to get back to that model that made us a great company,” said Bachus,now the top Republican on the Financial Services Committee.

Bachus replaces Democrat Barney Frank of Massachusetts as head of the financial committee. Frank won reelection by defeating Sean Bielat, a little-known Marine Corps reservist who mounted the toughest challenge that Frank has faced in years.

Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Deputy Editor

Julie Vorman joined the Center in 2010 after more than 20 years as a correspondent, bureau chief, and editor at Reuters. As the Washington company news editor, she guided Reuters’ coverage of federal multi-billion-dollar bailouts to U.S. banks and automakers after the 2008 financial meltdown, the healthcare industry’s influence as Congress attempted to reform healthcare, and changes within the Securities and Exchange Commission after the Madoff investment fraud scheme. Vorman led the Reuters team that won the “Best in Business Breaking News” award from the Society...

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.