May 24, 2012

New Defense Authorization Act Imposes Buy American Act Mandate for Photovoltaics

The 2011 Defense Authorization Act signed by the President this week contains a requirement in Section 846 for the Department of Defense to incorporate a clause in specified solar energy contracts requiring photovoltaic devices provided under the contract to comply with the Buy American Act, 41 U.S.C. 10a et seq., subject to the exceptions recognized under the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, 19 U.S.C. 2501 et seq. or otherwise provided by law. Photovoltaic devices are defined for purposes of the legislation as “devices that convert light directly into electricity through a solid-state, semiconductor process.
 

The contracts to which this new requirement applies include “energy savings performance contracts, utility service contracts, land leases, and private housing contracts, to the extent that such contracts result in ownership of photovoltaic devices by the Department of Defense.” 

Although on the surface one might expect this to limit the impact of the requirement to contracts that actually transfer legal title to the devices to DoD, the new requirement actually extends further because of a special definition of “ownership.” “Ownership” of a device by DoD is deemed to exist under the legislation if the device is “(1) installed on Department of Defense property or in a facility owned by the Department of Defense; and (2) reserved for the exclusive use of the Department of Defense for the full economic life of the device.” 

The Buy American requirement applies, therefore, not only when photovoltaic devices or articles containing them are sold to DoD, but also when such devices are installed on DoD property or in a DoD owned facility for the exclusive use of DoD for their “full economic life,” even if legal title to the equipment remains in a third party.

In addition to the Trade Agreement Act exception, the Buy American Act contains special exceptions for certain procurements based upon reasonable availability, relative cost and the public interest. See, e.g., Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement, Subpart 225.1 (revised Oct. 1, 2010). These other exceptions, however, are unlikely to play a role given the current market conditions in the solar equipment industry. The Buy American Act and Trade Agreements Act also have specific procurement dollar thresholds, and these vary for different countries qualifying under the Trade Agreements Act.

The exception under the Trade Agreements Act will permit the use of photovoltaic devices manufactured in a country that is a party to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement or that has a Free Trade Agreement with the United States. This will have an obvious impact on procurement from China, which is a large exporter of photovoltaic devices but is not yet a party to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement.

Under prior law, it was generally permissible to deliver to DoD photovoltaic cells of foreign origin that were incorporated into equipment that was the subject of a substantial transformation in the United States or in a qualifying country prior to delivery. If this new provision is applied by looking through any end item substantially transformed in the United States to require individual photovoltaic components to qualify, this will mean that DoD contractors who manufacture equipment in the United States incorporating photovoltaic components can no longer rely upon substantial transformation in the United States and will need to begin procuring the photovoltaic components in the United States or from countries that qualify under the Trade Agreements Act. It will be very interesting to see how the implementing regulations deal with this and the other issues raised by the new legislation.

For further discussion generally of the Buy American Act and the Trade Agreements Act, click here to visit the "BAA and TAA" section of our Government Contracts blog.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Partner

Curt Dombek is a partner in the Government Contracts and Regulated Industries Practice Group, based in Los Angeles who spends time regularly in the Firm's Shanghai office on international trade matters.

213-617-5595

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.