May 24, 2012

The New Form 990 for Tax-Exempt Organizations Asks Governance Questions

Commencing with tax filings for the taxable year 2008, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completely revised the Form 990 (the “Form”), which many tax-exempt organizations are required to file.  Among the changes is a new section that asks significant questions about how your organization is governed and managed.  The IRS takes the view that although these new questions concern areas that are not directly covered by the Internal Revenue Code, good governance affects whether tax issues are dealt with properly.  Because this new section of the Form brings governance questions to the forefront, this is a good time for tax-exempt organizations to review their governance and management policies.  Areas of focus in the new Form include the following.  

  1. Conflict of Interest Policy.  The Form asks whether the organization has a conflict of interest policy, and if so, whether officers, directors or trustees and key employees are required to disclose interests that could give rise to conflicts. Also, the Form asks whether the organization regularly and consistently monitors and enforces compliance with the conflicts policy, and if so, how this is done.  For the past few years, new tax-exempt organizations have been required to have a conflict of interest policy.  The new Form’s questions help to bring conformity to this area for existing tax-exempt organizations.  If a tax-exempt organization has not previously adopted a conflict of interest policy, we recommend that it now do so.  If it has such a policy in place, we recommend that the organization now review it and the organization’s compliance with it.  
  2. Whistleblower Policy.  The Form asks whether the organization has a whistleblower policy.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, enacted in 2002 to mandate better governance for corporations, makes it a crime for a nonprofit organization to retaliate against a whistleblower.  Although it has been a good idea for nonprofit organizations to adopt a whistle blower policy, Sarbanes-Oxley did not mandate this.  In light of this new question asked by the IRS, however, we recommend that tax-exempt organizations should now adopt a whistleblower policy if they have not already done so, or review any such existing policy.  
  3. Document Retention and Destruction Policy.  The Form asks whether the organization has a document retention and destruction policy.  The Sarbanes-Oxley Act made it a crime for nonprofit organizations to knowingly alter, destroy, conceal or falsify any record or document with intent to impede, obstruct, or influence a federal investigation or the administration of any other federal matter.  Again in light of this new question on the Form, we recommend that tax-exempt organizations adopt a document retention policy if they do not have one, or review any such existing policy.

The IRS is phasing in the new Form 990 over a three-year period to allow organizations to adjust to its requirements.  The phase-in is determined by the level of income and assets of an organization.  Eventually, for the taxable year 2010, tax-exempt organizations with gross receipts equal to or greater than $200,000, or assets of $500,000 or more, will be required to file the Form 990 rather than the simpler Form 990-EZ.

Circular 230 Disclosure
To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, unless specifically indicated otherwise, any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax related penalties or promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax related matter addressed herein.

© 2009 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Partner

Craig practices in the areas of taxation and trusts and estates. He has substantial experience in estate planning for owners of closely held businesses and tax planning for closely held companies and exempt organizations. Craig is also the leader of the firm's Trusts & Estates practice group.

Representative Experience 

  • Exit strategies for shareholders...
919-783-2943

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.