May 24, 2012

NLRB Back to Full Strength with Pro-Union Majority

The NLRB has returned to its full complement of five Board members. Board Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce administered the oath of office this week to recess appointees Sharon Block (D), Terence F. Flynn (R) and Richard F. Griffin (D). They join Pearce and Republican Brian Hayes.

This marks the first time since August 2010 that the Board has all five of its posts filled. The swearing-in means that the controversial and sweeping changes in the law delivered in 2011 by the Obama Board will likely continue in 2012. While Republicans are delighted to see Craig Becker off the Board, he's been effectively replaced by Griffin, most recently general counsel of the International Union of Operating Engineers. New member Block (D) is a former Labor Department deputy assistant secretary for congressional affairs, and Republican Flynn was chief counsel to Republican board member Brian Hayes.

Chairman Pearce has indicated that he's looking to complete the changes already started to the NLRB election rules, a portion of which were passed in December. The new rules will be effective April 30, if not blocked by lawsuits, and will speed union-organizing elections. One measure still on the table would require employers to disclose to the union the email addresses of employees eligible to vote. The board could also consider implementing electronic voting for union-organizing elections.

Make sure your tray tables are up and in the fully locked position. This could be a rough ride.

© 2012 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Gerald F. (“Jerry”) Lutkus is a partner in the South Bend office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP where he is a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law and Litigation Departments. He practices in the areas of labor and employment law counseling and litigation, arbitration, collective bargaining, media law, including counseling of and defense litigation for media companies and commercial and business litigation.

574-237-1118

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.