Advertisement

May 18, 2013

NLRB Board Issues a Weingarten Reminder

You remember Weingarten, right?  When an employee is brought in for an investigatory interview that could lead to disciplinary action, he or she has the right to Union representation upon the employee's request.  On the other side of that coin, if the employer has already decided that discipline is required, there is no right to representation when the employee is called in to receive the discipline (unless, of course, your CBA says something else).  Well, what happens if the discipline is pre-determined, handed to the employee when he comes in and then the employer starts asking questions about another subject?

That's the issue the NLRB recently examined in General Die Casters, 358 N.L.R.B. No. 85 7/25/12.

It should come as no surprise that the Board decided that representation is required if the employee requests a Union rep as the session moved into another area.  Specifically, the plant manager started asking the employee about an unrelated aspect of his conduct that bothered management.  The employee asked whether he needed "to get someone in here.” The plant manager said that he did not need to do that.  During the following discussion, the plant manager mentioned problems that the employee needed to address and he noted that these were "traits that have got you in trouble in the past." That was enough, the Board concluded, to find that a Weingarten right had arisen.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Gerald F. (“Jerry”) Lutkus is a partner in the South Bend office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP where he is a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law and Litigation Departments. He practices in the areas of labor and employment law counseling and litigation, arbitration, collective bargaining, media law, including counseling of and defense litigation for media companies and commercial and business litigation.

574-237-1118

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.