May 24, 2012

NYSDEC Recommends Lifting Fracking Ban, Subject to Limitations

As we mentioned earlier, Governor Cuomo requested that the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation's ("NYSDEC") Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement ("SGEIS") on horizontal drilling be completed for issuance by July 1, 2011.  On June 30, NYSDEC announced its recommendations from its report, set to be released today.  NYSDEC recommends that the moratorium on fracking be lifted, but that fracking be prohibited in the New York City and Syracuse watersheds, within 500 feet of primary aquifers, and on state-owned land.  Fracking would be allowed on privately held land, subject to "rigorous and effective controls."

These controls would (1) prohibit permits from being issued within 500 feet of a private water well or within 2,000 feet of a public drinking water supply well or reservoir, (2) require a third well casing around each well, (3) require additional spill control for flowback water and a DEC-approved plan for disposing of flowback water and production brine, and (4) require well applicants to disclose all fracking chemicals and consider chemicals that potentially pose less risk. 

Pursuant to the recently passed Water Withdrawal Reporting law, drillers also must obtain a special permit to withdraw large volumes of water.  This permit will impose conditions on water quantity, and require annual reporting on the amount of water being withdrawn or purchased.

UPDATE: Although the full SGEIS will not be made available until July 8, NYSDEC has released the Executive Summary, a SGEIS timeline, a document explaining what it learned from Pennsylvania, and a press release detailing who NYSDEC was appointing to its Hydraulic Fracturing Advisory Panel.

©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Associate

Caleb J. Holmes is an associate in Greenberg Traurig's Litigation and Environmental Groups.

215.988.7877

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.