July 22, 2014

Paula Deen and the Impact of Reputation Risks

Further illustrating how important reputation can be to a business enterprise, Paula Deen’s rapidly crumbling empire took another hit this week when Ballantine Books announced that it was cancelling the publication of the celebrity chef’s latest cookbook, Paula Deen’s New Testament: 250 Favorite Recipes, All Lightened Up, which was scheduled to be released in October as the first in a five-book deal signed last year. Even more surprising, was that based on pre-orders alone the book was already Amazon’s number-one best seller (Interestingly enough, the book was replaced at the top spot by another Paula Deen cookbook, Paula Deen’s Southern Cooking Bible.)

The book cancellation brought the total of business deals killed by Deen’s admission that she had used racial slurs in the past to 12. According to the Consumerist, the tally includes:

  1. Food Network

  2. Target

  3. Sears

  4. Kmart

  5. Walmart

  6. Smithfield Foods

  7. Caesar’s Entertainment

  8. Home Depot

  9. Novo Nordisk

  10. Walgreen’s

  11. JCPenney

  12. Ballantine

QVC has also decided to “take a pause” in its relationship with Deen, but stopped short of saying that it would permanently sever ties. According to a letter from QVC CEO Mike George:

“Paula won’t be appearing on any upcoming broadcasts and we will phase out her product assortment on our online sales channels over the next few months…Some of you may wonder whether this is a “forever” decision – whether we are simply ending our association with Paula. We don’t think that’s how relationships work. People deserve second chances. And we always strive to do the right thing.”

Deen’s misstep could come with a hefty pricetag. Deen earned a reported $17 million in 2012, according to Forbes, making her the fourth-highest paid celebrity chef after only Gordon Ransay, Rachael Ray and Wolfgang Puck. But the possible losses don’t end there. Burt Flickinger III, president of retail consultancy Strategic Resource Group told the Associated Pressthat Deen’s annual revenue from her endorsement business generates about $100 million a year. He estimated that the controversy has cost her at least half of that so far and that she could lose up to 80% by next year as other suppliers cancel their agreements as well.

Last year, in the pages of Risk Management, Ted Tafaro and Frank Zuccarello wrote about the big business of celebrity chefs and how companies needed some sort of contingency plan in place in case one of these chefs were to be laid up with an injury and couldn’t perform. What the article didn’t cover, however, was that a damaged reputation can be just as catastrophic for the business. The Deen controversy serves as a sobering reminder of how important it is to have a plan to deal with these reputation risks as well.

Gerald Baron at Crisisblogger offered some helpful advice on what those involved in “reputation wrecks” can do to mitigate the damage. In the end, as Baron writes, it’s about character. “Those responsible for [organizational] reputation have to take very seriously the character and integrity of those who represent and make decisions for the organization.”

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2014 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Editor in Chief

Morgan O’Rourke is the director of publications for the Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. (RIMS) and the editor in chief of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.