May 24, 2012

Peer Review Protections Broadened Under New Wisconsin Law

Wisconsin recently expanded its peer review protection through the enactment of the Wisconsin Health Care Quality Improvement Act (WHCQIA). This new legislation is part of Wisconsin’s tort reform bill and revises Wisconsin’s current peer review statutes, Wis. Stat. §§ 146.37 & .38. In particular, WHCQIA broadens peer review protections for health care providers by, among other things, allowing related entities to share peer review information and explicitly protecting incident reports created as part of an organization’s peer review process. These helpful additions to state peer review protections not only ensure that related entities can work together in monitoring quality patient care, but also add comfort to peer review processes.

The revised statute will apply to disclosures and releases made on or after February 1, 2011, even if the peer review sessions took place prior to that date.

Disclosure of Peer Review Information to Related Entities

WHCQIA revised Wisconsin’s current peer review statutes 146.37 and 146.38 to afford health care providers greater ability to share information obtained during the peer review process with related health care entities. Such entities include a provider’s employer; parent, subsidiary, or affiliate organization; or the employer’s parent, subsidiary or affiliate organization if the person who authorized the peer review consents to the disclosure. These entities are now considered “health care providers” in the sense that such entities cannot be forced to disclose peer review or evaluation information for the purpose of civil or criminal actions, and will not be held civilly liable for any damage that results from proper disclosure to other related entities.

WHCQIA also protects peer review from being introduced as evidence in criminal proceedings, as opposed to the former statute, which protected peer review in civil proceedings only.

Incident Reports Protected

In addition to the expansion of peer review protections to related entities, WHCQIA includes incident reports as documents that are protected from discovery under the revised statute. Prior to this change, it was not clear under state law whether incident reports presented to the peer review committee prior to formal peer review proceedings were protected. Now, WHCQIA defines “incident or occurrence reports,” as written or oral statements concerning an incident, practice, or other situation that becomes the subject of a review or evaluation as being immune from discovery. Thus, such reports are explicitly protected as peer review documents, although any person who participates in the review or evaluation still may testify in civil and criminal proceedings as to matters within his or her knowledge if the information is not obtained through participation in the peer review process.

©2012 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Doris Brosnan is a Shareholder and Leader of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Section, and focuses exclusively on assisting clients with employment issues. Doris regularly advises and trains health care, corporate and public sector organizations on how to deal with difficult employees, harassment and workplace violence, disability accommodations, FMLA and general development of effective employment policies and practices.

Doris litigates employment claims, representing clients in federal and state court and before administrative agencies and arbitrators. She also assists...

414-287-1405

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.