Advertisement

May 21, 2013

PIP Legislation Passes in the Florida House and Senate

The Florida House and Senate negotiated and passed personal injury protection (“PIP”) reform in the final hours of the legislative session. The final legislation, which can be found here, includes numerous reforms of the existing law and is hoped to reduce PIP fraud in Florida.

Although the legislation does not include attorneys’ fee caps, it contains an admonition of sorts that attorneys must “comply with prevailing professional standards,” that they “not overstate or inflate the number of hours reasonably necessary for a case of comparable skill or complexity,” and that their fees “represent legal services that are reasonable and necessary to achieve the result obtained.” The legislation eliminates fee risk multipliers in PIP cases. It also applies the offer of judgment statutory framework to PIP cases, allowing insurers to recover their fees when an insured recovers a statutorily specified percentage less than the insurer’s offer.

While the legislation preserves the $10,000 PIP benefit, this amount is available only for medical treatment of an emergency medical condition. Reimbursement for services for treatment of non-emergency conditions is limited to $2,500. An insured may still receive reimbursement for physical therapy, but only to the extent a doctor or chiropractor referred the insured for such treatment. The final legislation expressly excludes reimbursement for treatment by massage therapists and acupuncturists regardless of the provider and, with some exceptions, requires licensure of clinics seeking payment through PIP.

In a further attempt to eliminate PIP fraud, the legislation requires a long-form report to be used in all crashes where a party to the crash complains of any pain or discomfort. The legislation extends insurers’ fraud investigation period from 30 to 90 days. It also allows insurers to take an examination under oath of their PIP insureds. However, a business practice of unreasonable requests for examinations under oath may be deemed an unfair insurance practice by the Office of Insurance Regulation. The legislation imposes a 14-day timeframe within which an insured must seek medical treatment in order for such treatment to be covered under PIP. Through the course of such treatment, an insured may be asked to appear for an independent medical examination and may ultimately lose benefits based on a failure to do so.

The legislation includes other reforms including revisions to the PIP medical fee schedule, a requirement that a notice of the fee schedule be included in insurance policies, a requirement that insurers make Medicaid reimbursement payments within 30 days, the creation of a non-profit organization aimed at fighting motor vehicle insurance fraud, and the creation of a more user-friendly claim system.

Governor Rick Scott, a strong supporter of PIP reform, has called the passage of the PIP legislation “a triumphant moment for the residents of Florida.” Governor Scott is expected to sign the legislation into law.

©2002-2013 Fowler White Boggs P.A. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

About the Author

Associate

Sarah Lahlou-Amine practices in all areas of state and federal appellate litigation and insurance coverage litigation.

813-769-7849

About the Author

Government Affairs Consultant

Kim McGlynn represents individuals and entities having interests before the Florida legislature, state agencies, and the Governor and Cabinet.

850-681-0411

Contributors

Shareholder

Mike Underwood was a key official at the predecessor of the Florida Department of Financial Services and authored many provisions of Florida’s securities and banking laws. Since leaving government, he has become recognized as a national leader in financial services regulation, especially in Florida.  He represents securities broker-dealers, investment advisers, mortgage brokers, financial institutions and affiliated individuals in civil litigation, arbitration, regulatory investigations and enforcement actions. His experience includes defense of class actions,...

850-681-4238

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.