May 24, 2012

Proposed ITAR Rule To Relax ITAR Licensing For Components Incorporated Into Commercial Products

On March 15, 2011, the State Department Directorate of Defense Trade Controls published a proposed new rule that marks a significant change in the approach to ITAR regulation. Historically, ITAR controls have always applied to commercial end products incorporating any ITAR controlled components. This was the basis of the highly publicized QRS chip case, in which the State Department asserted continuing ITAR control over avionics chips that had originated on a military program but had come to be widely used in civilian jet aircraft. That case resulted eventually in a special exception to allow jet aircraft to remain in production and passenger service with the QRS chip and without ITAR licensing. 

The new rule, §126.19, sets out conditions under which an ITAR license will not be required for the export or reexport of a defense article incorporated into an end-item that is subject to the EAR. The conditions are that: 

  1. The defense article would be destroyed (i.e., rendered useless beyond the possibility of restoration) by its removal from the end-item, or the end-item would be rendered inoperable by the removal of the defense article and the value of the defense article is less than 1% of the value of the end-item;
     
  2. No technical data for development or production are transferred with the defense article; and
     
  3. The incorporation of the defense article does not provide and is not related to a military application.

The rule provides expressly that export of the ITAR controlled components as replacement parts would remain subject to ITAR licensing.

The new rule will not go into effect until the Department of Commerce amends the EAR such that the ITAR and CCL provide complimentary coverage of the articles in question. The Federal Register notice invites comments on the new rule through April 14, 2011.

Once it takes effect, this ITAR change has the potential to create new opportunities for commercial exploitation of technology in U.S. manufacturing by allowing EAR controlled equipment made in the United States to incorporate ITAR controlled components meeting the above conditions and be exported without ITAR licensing. The need for continued ITAR licensing of replacement parts will largely limit its impact, however, to products where repair and maintenance could be structured to provide for replacement of the entire EAR controlled end item or assembly.

Copyright © 2012, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

About the Author

Partner

Curt Dombek is a partner in the Government Contracts and Regulated Industries Practice Group, based in Los Angeles who spends time regularly in the Firm's Shanghai office on international trade matters.

213-617-5595

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.