July 25, 2014

Resubmission of Hospital Inpatient Medicare Claims That Were Denied As Not Reasonable And Necessary

On February 13, CGS Administrators, the Parts A and B Medicare Administrative Contractor for Kentucky and Ohio, relayed instructions to Medicare hospitals paid under the Inpatient Prospective Payment System from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regarding recent denied inpatient claims that can now be processed on an outpatient or observation basis. CGS' notice results from recent federal Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) decisions affecting the final payment for inpatient Medicare claims denied as not reasonable or necessary. 

ALJs hear Medicare appeals at level three, following a decision of a Qualified Independent Contractor. Following the relevant ALJ decisions, which reversed the initial payment denial decision, CGS will notify providers within 30 days of receiving a decision to secure a new replacement claim with the proper HCPCS billing code. The claim department at CGS will cancel the hospital's initial inpatient claim in the FISS (Fiscal Intermediary Standard System). Upon submitting the replacement claim, the hospital may include a line item for observation care only if there was a proper physician order for observation. But, CGS stated that "if the ALJ specified 'observation level of care' or 'including observation care,' line item charges for observation may be added if otherwise appropriate, as the ALJ is specifically substituting the order to admit for the order for observation." 

CGS further advised that the hospital must include in the claim remarks section the inpatient DCN (document control number), the ALJ rebilling code, and the observation code if applicable. The provider must refund the beneficiary any difference between the Part A deductible or coinsurance initially paid because the provider billed as an inpatient service and the Part B deductible or coinsurance now payable because the properly billable service is either an outpatient or observation service. 

CGS made clear that this treatment is being taken only to effectuate these specific ALJ orders. CGS must receive any replacement claims within 180 days or the claim will be considered closed. 

CGS’ announcement can be found here.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author


Annually appearing on The Best Lawyers in America list, as well as the Ohio Super Lawyers list, Tom has over 30 years of experience representing health care providers before state, federal and administrative courts across the country. He is the Practice Group Leader for the Government Relations and Health Law Practice Groups.

Leveraging extensive experience with a thorough understanding of the issues facing the health care industry, Tom takes a practical, yet aggressive approach to help clients meet their needs while also mitigating risk. Within the constantly-...

(614) 227-4260

About the Author


A member of the Corporate Department and Health Care Practice Group, Tyler has experience handling a variety of health care matters. Understanding that the health care industry is constantly evolving, Tyler places a premium on staying abreast of new developments and communicating them to clients. He drafts a monthly newsletter for health care clients, detailing new legislation and newsworthy health care issues, both to keep clients informed and enable them to take a proactive approach toward handling and resolving issues. He also has worked with health care providers regarding reporting...

(304) 357-9939

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Boa