May 24, 2012

SEC Delays Whistleblower Office, Citing Budget

The Securities and Exchange Commission says until it gets more money from Congress, it has to delay creating a new whistleblower office mandated by the Dodd-Frank financial reform law.

In a brief, two-sentence notice on the SEC website, the agency said it was putting on hold the whistleblower office – plus the new offices of credit ratings, investor advocate, municipal securities, and women and minority inclusion – because of “budget uncertainty.” All the offices are mandated by the reform law, which also set specific deadlines for the SEC to get them launched.

A few weeks ago, the SEC told Congress that it would have to create about 800 new jobs to carry out all the requirements of the Dodd-Frank law. Lawmakers have not yet approved an SEC budget for fiscal 2011, which began on Oct. 1. And when the new Congress begins work next month, the House Appropriations Committee will be led by Republicans, who generally take a dim view of reforms included in the financial regulation law.

The SEC issued a proposal last month that would create new whistleblower protections and encourage reports of abuse by offering a bounty on awards over $1 million. The agency is accepting public comments on its plan until Dec. 17. To fund payments to whistleblowers, the SEC already has set aside $452 million from past civil settlements in enforcement cases and invested the money in Treasury bills until it is needed.

Alternative to Payday Lenders?

Nine banks have volunteered for an experiment offering low-cost bank accounts to low-income consumers to pay bills and save money, says Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The year-long experiment aims to offer checkless accounts that encourage automatic savings – and do not carry any overdraft fees.

The FDIC recently wrapped up another pilot program in which selected banks offered small-dollar loans to consumers who would otherwise be forced to see costly payday loans. “One important lesson from the mortgage crisis is that selling consumer products that do not serve them well ends up hurting both consumers and banks, and weakening public confidence in the financial system as a whole,” Bair said in a speech at the Consumer Federation of America’s annual financial services conference.

Under the Dodd-Frank law, payday lenders will be regulated by the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Reprinted by Permission © 2012, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Deputy Editor

Julie Vorman joined the Center in 2010 after more than 20 years as a correspondent, bureau chief, and editor at Reuters. As the Washington company news editor, she guided Reuters’ coverage of federal multi-billion-dollar bailouts to U.S. banks and automakers after the 2008 financial meltdown, the healthcare industry’s influence as Congress attempted to reform healthcare, and changes within the Securities and Exchange Commission after the Madoff investment fraud scheme. Vorman led the Reuters team that won the “Best in Business Breaking News” award from the Society...

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.