May 24, 2012

A Second Chance for North Carolina Development

As a result of the slumping economy and the inability of many developers to obtain financing for development projects, the General Assembly recently approved legislation that would toll the expiration of various development approvals. The Permit Extension Act of 2009 (S.L. 2009-406 S. 831), effective August 5, 2009, provides a second chance for state and local development approvals, as well as extends the life of new approvals. In short, the legislation suspends the expiration of development approvals that were current and valid at any point during the three year period running from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2010.

The law provides a detailed list of the “development approvals” that are tolled during the three year period. Among the state development approvals are erosion and sedimentation control plans, CAMA permits, water and wastewater permits, nondischarge permits, water quality certifications, and air quality permits. Approvals by local governments include sketch plans, preliminary and final plats under a land subdivision ordinance, site specific or phased development plans under the statutory zoning vested rights provisions, certificates of appropriateness issued by historic commissions, other development permits, and building permits. Federal permits, however, are not tolled by the new law.

The primary question raised by the new law is whether the expiration of all development approvals during this period are moved to December 31, 2010 or whether the approval retains whatever life it had remaining during the three year tolling period. The law says “the running of the period of the development approval” is suspended during the three year period. Therefore, the language clearly suggests that the time period to act on the development approval during the three year tolling period is suspended and the clock begins to run again on January 1, 2011. For example, if a developer obtains a development approval on March 1, 2008 that requires construction to begin within 12 months, that 12 month period would not begin to run until January 1, 2011. If, however, the development approval was obtained on March 1, 2007, the clock would stop running on January 1, 2008 and would resume on January 1, 2011. The developer would then have 3 months remaining on his development approval to begin construction.

This new legislation provides a substantial benefit to the development community and should help provide developers with the necessary time to obtain financing and/or other development approvals in order to keep projects alive during these tough economic times. Knowing how to take advantage of this new law could prove to be a valuable tool in the success of a development project.

A complete copy of the Permit Extension Act of 2009 can be found at http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2009/Bills/Senate/PDF/S831v6.pdf.

© 2009 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Associate

Chad primarily represents land owners, developers and local governments in state and federal court on a myriad of land-use and zoning issues including vested rights, constitutional matters and zoning ordinance interpretations. He also represents land owners and developers before local Boards of Adjustment, Planning Commissions, City Councils, and County Commissioners on matters related to zoning, permitting, variances, annexations, special use permits, site plans, subdivisions and road closings.

Chad has experience representing clients in administrative and civil dispute resolution...

(919) 783-2896

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.