Advertisement

April 24, 2014

Section 409A: Arrangements that Require Execution of a Release as a Condition to Severance May Require Action by Dec. 31, 2012

Any arrangement that requires an employee to execute and deliver a release (or take some other action) as a condition to receiving severance or another deferred compensation payment should be promptly reviewed and, if necessary, amended for compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 409A”). The review of such arrangements should be done even if the operative instruments were previously amended for compliance with Section 409A. Since the enactment of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, which created the statutory provision, the IRS has issued multiple guidance and continues to identify issues that were previously not considered by practitioners to fall within the purview of the rules.

Section 409A requires that nonqualified deferred compensation plans comply with certain distribution election and timing of payment requirements, the violation of which results in the deferred compensation for the current and preceding years being immediately taxable and subject to a 20 percent penalty payable by the participant. The IRS has indicated that the interaction of release agreements and deferred compensation payments could run afoul of the rules thereby resulting in the adverse tax consequences.

The IRS noted that if an employee could have the opportunity to manipulate the timing of a deferred compensation payment through the employee’s actions (e.g., by timing the execution of a release agreement), then that arrangement could violate Section 409A. The foregoing scenario is problematic because the employee could effectively shift the time of payment from one calendar year to another, which violates the Section 409A rules that prohibit the participant from delaying the time of distribution unless certain rigorous requirements are met. One common example is an employment agreement with a severance provision that conditions payment on the execution by the employee of a release. Assume there is an employment agreement which (1) is subject to Section 409A, (2) provides for a lump sum severance payment equal to 12 months of base salary, and (3) provides for payment within 60 days after the execution and delivery by the employee of a release. The IRS will conclude that the employee can effectively control which year the severance payment will be made by controlling the timing of the execution and delivery of the release and, therefore, this agreement does not comply with Section 409A. There are ways to amend such an agreement to comply with Section 409A. To take advantage of special relief offered by the IRS under IRS Notice 2010 6 and IRS Notice 2010 80 and to avoid the tax penalties of Section 409A, however, action needs to be taken by Dec. 31, 2012.

© 2014 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

At Barnes & Thornburg LLP, our corporate attorneys are dedicated to the single, yet encompassing, goal of helping our clients achieve their business objectives. We bring experience, efficiency, energy and creativity to the single-minded pursuit of this goal.

We offer advice and counseling on a wide range of legal issues facing business in the 21st century. Whether you are a Fortune 500 company, an emerging growth company, or a middle market company positioned in between, we are committed to providing prompt and proactive, value-added service, while placing at your disposal...

317-231-7803

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.