February 8, 2012

Service Provider Fee Disclosure: Another Step Towards Fee Transparency

Plan fiduciaries who are in the midst of implementing the new Form 5500 Schedule C requirements for service provider fees may not want to think about additional fee disclosures.  But, on July 16, the Department of Labor (DOL), concluding that Congress did not intend to act on this issue, released an interim final regulation requiring service providers to make additional disclosures to plan fiduciaries.

This regulation emphasizes service providers’ obligations to furnish additional disclosures to the plan fiduciary.  Yet, in fact, it is principally plan fiduciaries who will have significant new responsibilities under this regulation since the regulation describes the conditions that must be satisfied for the plan fiduciary to avoid a prohibited transaction.

Background

The DOL’s first effort towards fee transparency was the publication of the Form 5500 Schedule C requirements which are effective for the 2009 plan year.  The second effort consists of these fee disclosure requirements, which were originally published as a proposed regulation and a proposed class exemption on December 13, 2007.  In the interim, several legislative proposals were introduced, but no proposal was enacted. As a result, the DOL released this revised version of the regulation as an interim final regulation (i.e., subject to further comment by August 30).

Summary

The following summary looks at the regulation from the responsible plan fiduciary’s perspective.  The regulation uses the term responsible plan fiduciary, which means the plan fiduciary in control of the service provider arrangement.

     A.  When Is the Regulation Effective and Which Plans are Involved?

  • Timing. The regulation is effective July 16, 2011, one year from the date of issuance.  On that date, it applies to all covered service contracts then in place.  Thus, for contracts in existence at that time, the information must be received by July 16, 2011.  Thereafter, in general, the information must be provided reasonably in advance of the date the service provider contract is entered into, extended or renewed.  Changes in information already provided must generally be made as soon as possible but no later than 60 days from when the service provider is informed of the change.  Good-faith reasonable disclosure errors or omissions by the service provider should be corrected as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 days after the service provider learns of the error or omission.
     
  • Plan Coverage.  The current rule applies to ERISA pension plans, both defined benefit and defined contribution.  (The DOL rejected arguments seeking to exempt small plans (fewer than 100 participants).)  The rule is inapplicable to IRAs.  While the rule will eventually apply to welfare plans, that part of the rule has been reserved for now.
     
  • Exclusivity.  The regulation specifically provides that it must be followed in order for a service contract to be reasonable as required for the statutory prohibited transaction exemption.  Thus, the prohibited transaction exemption in ERISA Section 408(b)(2) will arguably not be available if the procedures are not followed.

     B.  What Steps Should Plan Fiduciaries Be Prepared to Take?

The regulation does not require that existing service contracts be amended to reference the disclosure obligations.  Still, most fiduciaries will want any new service contracts to include the service provider’s obligations in this area.

Under the regulation, responsible plan fiduciaries need to be prepared to implement a disclosure process which consists essentially of 4 steps:

  • STEP ONE—Covered service providers must furnish the responsible plan fiduciary with disclosures relating to fees.  A service provider is exempt from the regulation if it reasonably does not expect to receive $1,000 or more in direct and indirect compensation during the term of the arrangement.  Compensation is anything of monetary value (direct or indirect) in excess of $250.  However, fees paid by the plan sponsor are not either direct or indirect compensation under the regulation.
     

A Covered Service Provider is One Who (or Who Through an Affiliate or Subcontractor) Provides:

  1. Services as a fiduciary or registered investment adviser. This includes:
     
  • Services provided directly to the covered plan as an ERISA fiduciary;
     
  • Services provided as a fiduciary to an investment contract, product, or entity that holds plan assets (as determined under the “plan asset” rules) and in which the covered plan has a direct equity investment (a direct equity investment does not include investments made by the investment contract, product, or entity in which the covered plan invests); or
     
  • Services provided directly to the covered plan as a registered investment adviser.
  1. Recordkeeping services or brokerage services provided to a covered plan that is an individual account plan and that permits participants or beneficiaries to direct the investment of their accounts, if one or more designated investment alternatives will be made available (e.g., through a platform or similar mechanism) in connection with such recordkeeping services or brokerage services.
     
  2. Any of the following services, if the provider will receive indirect or related party compensation: accounting, auditing, actuarial, appraisal, banking, consulting (i.e., consulting related to the development or implementation of investment policies or objectives, or the selection or monitoring of service providers or plan investments), custodial, insurance, investment advisory (for plan or participants), legal, recordkeeping, securities or other investment brokerage, third-party administration, or valuation services provided to the covered plan.

    Affiliates and subcontractors of a covered service provider are not themselves covered service providers.

Required Disclosures by Covered Service Providers:

  1. A description of the services to be provided to the covered plan (but not including certain nonfiduciary services relating to an investment contract, product, or entity in which the plan invests).
     
  2. A statement, where applicable, that the status of the person providing the services is as a fiduciary or as a registered investment adviser.
     
  3. A  description  of all direct compensation, either in the aggregate or by service (required for recordkeeping), that the covered service provider, an affiliate, or a subcontractor reasonably expects to receive.
     
  4. A description of all indirect compensation that the covered service provider, an affiliate, or a subcontractor reasonably expects to receive; the services for which the indirect compensation will be received; and the payer of the indirect compensation. If there is no explicit compensation for recordkeeping services, a good-faith estimate is required.
     
  5. A description of any compensation that will be paid among related parties, the covered service provider, an affiliate, or a subcontractor, if it is set on a transaction basis (e.g., commissions, soft dollars, finder’s fees or other similar incentive compensation based on business placed or retained) or is charged directly against the covered plan’s investment and reflected in the net value of the investment (e.g., Rule 12b-1 fees); the services for which such compensation will be paid; and the payers and recipients of such compensation (including the status of a payer or recipient as an affiliate or a subcontractor).
     
  6. A description of any compensation that the covered service provider, an affiliate, or a subcontractor reasonably expects to receive in connection with termination of the contract or arrangement, and how any prepaid amounts will be handled.
     
  7. A description of the manner in which the compensation will be received (e.g., billed or deducted directly).
  • STEP TWO—The plan fiduciary must determine that all covered service providers have reported and that the reports are complete and adequate.  The fiduciary then reviews and evaluates the information it has received.  If the information is complete, the fiduciary uses it to make the fiduciary’s evaluation of the arrangement and determination of reasonableness.
     
  • STEP THREE—If the information is incomplete or if a covered service provider has not responded, the plan fiduciary must follow up with the service provider in writing.  The service provider must generally respond within 30 days of the written request.
     
  • STEP FOUR—If the service provider refuses to respond or fails to respond adequately within 90 days, the fiduciary must, within 30 days of the refusal or failure, provide a detailed written notice to the DOL identifying, among other things, the defaulting covered service provider, the information not provided, and the date of the fiduciary’s written request.
     

In connection with a failure or refusal to provide information, the plan fiduciary must also make a reasoned determination as to whether or not to continue the service arrangement.

     C.  Conclusion

Covered service providers will need to develop processes for compliance with this regulation and provide timely and adequate information to plan fiduciaries.  However, the burden of determining the adequacy of their response and taking any appropriate action for inadequate responses rests with the responsible plan fiduciary.  Otherwise, the prohibited transaction exemption for the responsible plan fiduciary may not be available.
 

FEDERAL TAX NOTICE:  Treasury Regulations require us to inform you that any federal tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person or entity for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

© 2012 Vedder Price P.C.

About the Author

Shareholder

John J. Jacobsen, Jr. has been practicing benefits and fiduciary conduct law since he joined the firm in 1975.  His areas of concentration include design, implementation and administration of all types of employee benefits plans and counseling for plan fiduciaries relating to plan administration and to litigation issues both in the claims procedure and in court.

Mr. Jacobsen is an active member of the Employee Benefits Committee of the Chicago Bar Association and the Employee Benefits Committee of the Tax Section of the American Bar Association.  He has lectured at...

312-609-7680

About the Author

Chair, Employee Benefits Group

Philip L. Mowery joined the Chicago office of Vedder Price in the Employee Benefits Group in 1988 and became a shareholder in 1995. He counsels a variety of corporations in the manufacturing and service industries on all aspects of employee benefits law, including the design, tax qualification, legal compliance, interpretation and communication of employee benefit plans. He also counsels employers and executives in the negotiation and implementation of executive compensation agreements and programs. Finally, he represents management and...

312-609-7642

About the Author

Paul F. Russell has worked in the Employee Benefits Group since joining Vedder Price in 1973. He has extensive experience in virtually all aspects of employee benefits, including the design, drafting, implementation and termination of qualified pension, profit sharing, 401(k), cash balance and ESOP plans for employers of all sizes. He frequently advises employers regarding fiduciary issues under ERISA and serves as benefits counsel in connection with merger and acquisition transactions. He also has significant experience with the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor...

312-609-7740

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.