May 24, 2012

Service Providers to ERISA Plans: DOL’s New Disclosure Regulations Are Imminent—Are You Ready?

According to Department of Labor (DOL) officials, the agency will soon publish a "final" final regulation on required disclosures by plan service providers under the statutory prohibited transaction exemption provided by Section 408(b)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). This makes it a good time for plan service providers (such as investment advisers, broker-dealers, banks, insurance companies, and recordkeepers) and plan fiduciaries to assess where they are in their efforts to comply with the new disclosure rules. The new rules are currently scheduled to become effective on April 1, 2012.

These new rules have been added as a condition to an exemption from the ERISA prohibited transaction rules that, absent other exemptive relief, is necessary for firms to provide such basic services as recordkeeping and investment management to ERISA plan clients. By their terms, the rules apply to ERISA-covered retirement plans, mainly corporate tax-qualified plans such as defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans (including 401(k) plans), but not to welfare plans such as health plans and life insurance plans (although DOL is considering extending the rules to such plans) or individual retirement accounts (IRAs) (including IRAs that are part of "Simple" or "SEP" arrangements).

"Covered service providers" under the new rules include plan fiduciaries, 401(k) plan recordkeepers, and the providers of certain other services that expect to receive "indirect" compensation (i.e., compensation from sources other than the plan or plan sponsor) under their arrangements with covered plans. The rules require detailed disclosure of both the direct and indirect compensation that a covered service provider anticipates receiving in connection with the services it provides to a plan, as well as a description of the services provided for that compensation.

DOL published an "interim" final regulation on these rules in July 2010, with an effective date in July 2011. Because of delays in publishing a "final" final regulation, the compliance date was subsequently postponed, first to January 1, 2012 and later to April 1, 2012.

According to recent reports, the "final" final regulation has received partial clearance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and is awaiting one further clearance from OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Once the regulation receives that clearance, possibly within the next few weeks, it should be ready to move forward. While this leaves at the most a little more than four months until the compliance date, there are no indications at this time that DOL will further extend that date.

During the past year, service providers have been assessing how the new disclosure rules will apply to their business units, and have begun developing programs and protocols to comply with the rules by the effective date. Some of the large recordkeeping firms have already provided sample disclosure materials to their clients. However, there remain many open issues. This is particularly the case for financial services firms, such as brokerage firms, that provide different levels of services to retirement plans and receive various streams of revenues, direct and indirect, in connection with those services.

The "final" final regulation is expected to address at least some of the open issues, which should simplify compliance. However, it may also contain additional requirements, such as a mandated format for the required disclosures. Service providers should be prepared to review the new regulation when it is released to determine whether their compliance programs are on track for the applicable compliance date, and whether additional steps will need to be taken.

In addition, the compliance date for the new participant disclosure requirements for participant-directed plans (DOL Regulation section 2550.404a-5) is 60 days after the compliance date for the service provider disclosure rules. This means that participant-directed plan recordkeepers and plan sponsors will also want to determine if they are on track to comply with those rules.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Michael B. Richman is of counsel in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice. In addition to employee benefits, Mr. Richman's practice includes the investment management and securities areas. His principal focus is on matters under the ERISA fiduciary responsibility rules. These have included fiduciary governance of ERISA plans, prohibited transaction issues in proposed transactions and transactions under government investigation, and preparing requests to the U.S. Department of Labor for prohibited transaction exemptions and advisory opinions. Mr...

202-739-5036

About the Author

Partner

Daniel R. Kleinman is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Investment Management and Securities Industry Practice and a member of the ERISA Fiduciary Services Group. Mr. Kleinman's practice focuses on the fiduciary responsibilities provisions (Title I) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the related tax, corporate and securities laws in connection with the structuring and marketing of investment products (including private equity and hedge funds) and financial services to employee benefit plans. He also handles issues with respect to the regulation of broker-dealers...

202-739-5143

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.