May 24, 2012

STOPGAP EXTENSION OF COBRA SUBSIDIES—Further Extension Likely

Vedder Price

On March 2, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Temporary Extension Act of 2010 (H.R. 4691), which includes a stopgap extension from March 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 of eligibility for the COBRA subsidies that were originally part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”).1  The legislation also clarifies Congress’ intent that an employee who loses coverage as a result of a reduction in hours and later incurs an involuntary termination of employment is eligible to elect subsidized COBRA coverage.

Overview

The legislation is intended to accomplish the following:

  •  Extend the ARRA COBRA subsidy eligibility period from March 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010;
  • Clarify that employees who incur a COBRA qualifying event on or after September 1, 2008 that is a reduction in hours and who later incur an involuntary termination of employment on or after March 2, 2010 and on or before March 31, 2010 are eligible for the ARRA COBRA subsidies; and
  • Require notification to individuals described above within 60 days of their date of termination that they may elect subsidized COBRA coverage, regardless of whether they previously declined or stopped paying for COBRA coverage.

Extension of Eligibility Period

As has been widely reported, the eligibility period for the ARRA COBRA subsidy ended on February 28, 2010.  The legislation extends the eligibility period retroactively from March 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010.

Reduction in Hours Followed by Involuntary Termination

In addition, the new law clarifies Congress’ intent regarding the effect of a reduction in hours (triggering traditional COBRA rights) and a subsequent involuntary termination of employment.  The law as originally enacted was interpreted by the U.S. Department of Labor and the Internal Revenue Service as notapplying to individuals who first incurred a COBRA qualifying event due to reduction in hours, even if they later incurred an involuntary termination of employment.  This is because the original COBRA qualifying event related to reduction in hours rather than an involuntary termination of employment.

This legislation reverses that administrative interpretation.  Under the new law, individuals who incurred a COBRA qualifying event on or after September 1, 2008, consisting of a reduction in hours, followed by an involuntary termination of employment on or after March 2, 2010 and on or before March 31, 2010, will be eligible to elect subsidized COBRA coverage until the earlier of (i) the end of the original COBRA period (measured from the original qualifying event) or (ii) the end of the 15-month COBRA subsidy period.

Eligible individuals who previously lost coverage as the result of a reduction in hours, are involuntarily terminated on or after March 2, 2010 and on or before March 31, 2010, and who either did not make a COBRA election or made a COBRA election and later discontinued that election will have a special additional 60-day COBRA election period.  The 60-day election period begins on the date that notice is provided to the eligible individual about the special election period.  This special election period does not extend COBRA continuation coverage beyond the original COBRA period (measured from the original qualifying event), and any COBRA continuation coverage elected pursuant to this special election period is prospective only.  However, the period of time following the original loss of coverage or subsequent dropping of coverage does not count as a gap in coverage that would permit the application of any pre-existing condition limitation provisions.

As before, we expect that the government will develop model notices for use by employers. 

Example:  an employee who originally lost coverage due to a reduction in hours on August 31, 2009, who did not elect COBRA coverage as a result of that loss of coverage, and who is involuntarily terminated on March 31, 2010, will be eligible for the ARRA COBRA subsidy beginning April 1, 2010, and may continue on COBRA through February 28, 2011 (i.e., 18 months from September 1, 2009).

Looking Forward

While it is important to pay attention to this stopgap extension, it is widely expected that the ARRA COBRA subsidy provisions will be extended by future legislation through at least the end of 2010.  In this regard, such an extension is currently part of a larger jobs bill that has been introduced in the U.S. Senate by Senator Reid (D. Nev.) and Senator Baucus (D. Mont.).  This larger bill may also contain other benefits changes (e.g., pension funding relief) that will be of interest to Vedder Price’s employee benefits clients.  We will continue to monitor developments on this legislation and will provide Employee Benefits Briefings as events warrant. 

FEDERAL TAX NOTICE:  Treasury Regulations require us to inform you that any federal tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any person or entity for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code.

 

© 2012 Vedder Price

About the Author

Chair, Employee Benefits Group

Philip L. Mowery joined the Chicago office of Vedder Price in the Employee Benefits Group in 1988 and became a shareholder in 1995. He counsels a variety of corporations in the manufacturing and service industries on all aspects of employee benefits law, including the design, tax qualification, legal compliance, interpretation and communication of employee benefit plans. He also counsels employers and executives in the negotiation and implementation of executive compensation agreements and programs. Finally, he represents management and...

312-609-7642

Contributors

Jessica L. Winski joined Vedder Price P.C. in 2008 as an associate in the Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Groups.  She has experience in all aspects of employee benefits law, including the design and administration of qualified retirement plans and health and welfare plans.  She frequently advises clients in the design of nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements, including compliance with Code Section 409A.  She also assists executives and companies in the design and negotiation of executive employment agreements, severance arrangements and incentive...

312-609-7678

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.