Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Stricter Smog Standards to Burden Municipalities and Industry

Andrews Kurth LLP

On January 7, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it will again lower national standards for ground-level ozone (smog), which will further restrict development and industry in some 650 counties across the U.S., particularly in California, the Gulf Coast, the Atlantic seaboard and industrial Midwest. The proposed rule is controversial because it will create compliance problems for many industries and local governmental entities. 

EPA is proposing to set the new primary air quality standard for health-based risks at between 0.060 and 0.070 ppm on an 8-hour averaged basis, down from the 0.075 ppm level imposed by the Bush Administration in 2008. EPA will also set a secondary standard aimed at protecting public welfare (i.e., effects on vegetation, forests and crops) at 7-15 ppm-hours on a cumulative seasonal basis for the hotter summer months. The agency announced in September 2009 that it would reconsider the Bush standard in response to complaints from some in the environmental and scientific community that the standards were not sufficiently protective of human health. Others have argued that a lower standard would be increasingly difficult to meet as targets approach natural background concentrations of ozone. Ground-level ozone is formed when emissions from industrial facilities, power plants, landfills, motor vehicles, and natural sources such as vegetation, react in sunlight, and has been linked to health problems such as asthma and other respiratory illnesses.
 
EPA will issue the revised standards by August 2010, and nonattainment areas will then begin a multi-year process to implement the new standards and additional controls on emissions sources. EPA is proposing to accelerate the usual schedule to require attainment by 2014 to 2031, depending on the area's nonattainment status. Hundreds of states and counties are already struggling to meet current air quality standards, and the unavailability of affordable reductions has hampered the building of new hospitals and schools and has limited industrial output in many areas. Failure to meet attainment can result in loss of federal transportation funding and per-ton penalties on industrial emissions. 

The rule was published in the Federal Register early last week. 75 Fed. Reg. 2938 (Jan. 19, 2010). Public comment will be accepted for 60 days (until March 10, 2010). Public hearings have been scheduled for February 2, 2010 in Arlington, Virginia and Houston, Texas, and February 4, 2010 in Sacramento, California.

© 2013 Andrews Kurth LLP

About the Author

Lisa's practice focuses on environmental, health and safety counseling, compliance and liability. She has extensive experience analyzing environmental, health and safety issues associated with corporate and securities matters as well as transactions involving contaminated properties including Brownfield redevelopment. Lisa has experience in a wide spectrum of associated matters including negotiation of environmental insurance policies, indemnity provisions and access agreements as well as SEC disclosure issues for a wide range of industries. She has worked with industry associations and...

512-320-9222
Partner

Most recently, Paul consulted with the Mongolian national government and various other corporate and individual stakeholders, designing a citizen participation program. At the request of the country’s Secretaries of the Ministries of Environment and Mineral Resources, he has continued to coordinate the first-ever pilot project for Mongolia.

Paul also serves on the American Arbitration Association Panel for environmental, energy and natural resource matters.

He has substantial jury and bench trial experience in federal and state courts involving groundwater and surface...

713-220-4193

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.