Advertisement

May 18, 2013

Taxpayers Foot Bill for Oil and Gas Well Cleanup on Federal Land

Oil and gas companies producing on federal land are required to pay a bond to the Bureau of Land Management, which serves as an incentive for the operator to eventually plug the well and clean up the area. But the bond minimum hasn’t changed since 1960.

For five decades, the bond minimum has been set at $10,000 and has not been adjusted for inflation, which would be $59,360 in 2009 dollars. With such a low bond, operators have little incentive to clean up the area and instead stomach the loss of $10,000, pushing the cost of cleanup onto the taxpayer.

The cost of plugging a single well can amount to more than $100,000 and just getting a work crew to a well site might cost $10,000. “These minimum bond amounts are inadequate for managing potential liability,” the Government Accountability Office said.

Bureau offices applied bond amount increases differently. Some only increased the amount if the operator didn’t comply with contract terms. Other offices calculated the potential liability mathematically to identify if a bond should be increased.

A lack of accurate data also restricts the Bureau’s ability to evaluate potential liabilities or monitor agency performance. For example, the Bureau reported 2,300 inactive wells, while the Department of the Interior indicated the number is almost double that.

“The challenges the Bureau of Land Management faces in managing potential liabilities are interdependent and cannot be solved in a piecemeal fashion,” the GAO report said.  The GAO recommends increasing the bond minimum and improving the system to evaluate liabilities.

FAST FACT: In 2009, the wells on federal lands produced 11 percent of the nation’s gas supply and 5 percent of the oil supply.

Following are other new watchdog reports released by the Government Accountability Office (GAO), various federal Offices of Inspector General (OIG), and other government entities.

MISC.

  • An audit of Rural Development Service loans provided to victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita found that some victims received duplicate assistance, and some aid went to people unaffected by the storms. Some recipients also used grant fund for prohibited repairs and improvements. A total of $452,000 in grant money was questioned. (Inspector General USDA)
Reprinted by Permission © 2013, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept