May 25, 2012

Time to Cut Costs? Consider Paying Expenses from the Retirement Plan Trust

In these tough economic times, employers want to cut any costs they can.  The HR department can help by considering whether retirement plan costs traditionally paid by the company such as consulting and professional fees, can instead be paid from retirement plan funds.  Thankfully the rules governing use of retirement plan funds to pay plan expenses are relatively simple.

The general rule is that costs of administering the plan and communicating with participants may be paid by the retirement plan.  Costs of plan design must be paid by the company.  It is a prohibited transaction for the retirement plan to pay an expense that should have been borne by the company, such as a plan design change study.  Examples of expenses that may be paid by the plan include audit fees, fees for preparing communication materials such as summary plan descriptions, and fees for legal advice regarding plan operation.  Examples of fees that may not be paid from the retirement plan include fees paid for a study to redesign retirement plan benefits or fees to consider plan options in implementing a new law change. 

It is best for companies to inform their service providers in advance that the company would like for the retirement plan to pay expenses.  This allows the service providers to separately track expenses that are not eligible to be paid from the retirement plan.  Additionally, prior to paying any expenses from the plan trust, companies should check with their benefits advisors to verify that the expenses may be paid by the plan trust.  It is also necessary to review the plan’s language to verify that payment of the expenses will not violate the plan’s terms.  Finally, companies should check with their recordkeepers to determine the recordkeeper’s ability to account for expenses paid from the plan.   

© 2009 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

David practices in the area of employment litigation.  He regularly advises and defends clients in race, age, disability and sex discrimination and harassment cases; reviews handbooks and termination issues; and provides compliance advice on matters of employment law.

Representative Experience

McNeil v. Scotland County - Obtained summary judgment for employer where plaintiff alleged race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Successfully...

919-783-2854
Partner

Nancy practices in the area of employee benefits and ERISA. She has significant experience designing and documenting retirement plans and executive compensation plans as well as providing administrative advice on these plans. Nancy has represented clients before the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor, and she has represented clients in matters involving employee benefit due diligence, negotiation and planning in the context of mergers and acquisitions.

Representative Experience

    • Designed and documented retirement plans
    • ...
704-342-5275

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.