May 25, 2012

Trademark Owners Should Plan for the Arrival of .XXX Domain Names

In April 2011, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) authorized the creation of a new .xxx sponsored top-level domain (sTLD) for the adult entertainment industry. (sTLDs are designed for members of a specific community.) Initially, an adult entertainment company will need to show some prior rights in a mark before it can obtain a corresponding .xxx domain name for its mark. Later, however, such limitations will fall away and any available term may be registered as a .xxx domain name. Beginning on September 7, 2011, owners of trademark registrations can prevent their marks from being registered as .xxx domain names through a mechanism referred to as "Sunrise B."

To take advantage of Sunrise B, a party must own a valid trademark registration in a jurisdiction where the party has engaged in substantial bona fide commercial activities. The cost of blocking the registration of a .xxx domain name during Sunrise B will be approximately US$200 to US$300. Once blocked, the .xxx domain name in question will not be available for registration for a period of 10 years. The blocked .xxx domain name will be "reserved" from registration and will take readers to a standard page that indicates that the domain name has been blocked from use. In addition, the WHOIS report (i.e., the domain name title record) for this domain name will only identify the ICM Registry, the authorized registry for .xxx, as the registrant.

ICM Registry has stated that it is only offering trademark owners this one opportunity to block the registration of .xxx domain names that correspond with their registered trademarks. After that, trademark owners would need to bring an infringement, dilution, cybersquatting, or similar claim to try to stop use of a .xxx domain name that incorporates their marks. Such proceedings, whether in court or pursuant to a Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy proceeding, would obviously be more expensive than using Sunrise B, and would have a far less certain outcome.

Sunrise B is scheduled to begin on September 7, 2011, and will run for 30 days, closing on October 7, 2011.

For those in the adult entertainment industry, during the same time period there will be a mechanism known as "Sunrise A," where members of this sponsored community may register .xxx domain names that directly correspond with their registered trademarks or with their preexisting second-level domain names in an existing top-level domain (e.g., .com, .net), as long as the latter existing top-level domain was registered prior to February 2010. Sunrise A, like Sunrise B, will close on October 7, 2011.

Beginning on December 6, 2011, .xxx domain names will become generally available to any party on a first-come, first-served basis. Accordingly, starting on that date, anyone can register a .xxx domain name that corresponds with any term, including another party's registered trademark. Domain names that are registered by parties that are not members of the sponsored community (i.e., the adult entertainment industry) will be blocked from resolving to a website. However, it remains unclear how easy or difficult it will be for such registrants to make their .xxx domain names functional. Even if they remain nonfunctional, there may be a willing buyer in the adult entertainment industry who, under ICM Registry rules, could use such domain names unimpeded (until challenged in a legal proceeding by the trademark owner).

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Ron N. Dreben is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Intellectual Property Practice.Mr. Dreben focuses on integrated brand advertising, sponsored entertainment, and technology, as well as all areas of trademark, copyright, trade secret, licensing, and related intellectual property law.

202.739.5213

About the Author

Partner

Karen A. Butcher is a partner and a practice group leader in Morgan Lewis's Intellectual Property Practice. Ms. Butcher's practice focuses on business transactions and strategic counseling regarding brands and related intellectual property.

202-739-5526

Contributors

Partner

James R. Sims III is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Intellectual Property Practice. His practice focuses on copyright, trademark, licensing, and franchising issues for clients in the financial services, pharmaceutical and life science, high-technology, food, education, consumer products, luxury resort lodging, and publishing industries. Mr. Sims works with clients to protect, exploit, and enforce their copyrights and trademarks domestically and internationally. He has drafted and negotiated numerous copyright and trademark licenses, franchise agreements, and...

202.739.5216

About the Author

Associate

Dana S. Gross is an associate in Morgan Lewis's Intellectual Property Practice. His practice focuses on a variety of intellectual property matters, including trademark clearance and prosecution; trademark counseling and enforcement; and domain name acquisition, management, and protection. Mr. Gross also assists clients with the intellectual property aspects of corporate transactions and negotiating and drafting licenses, assignments, and other related documents. In addition, he has litigated trademark, unfair competition, and counterfeiting actions,...

202-739-5151

About the Author

Partner

Rochelle D. Alpert is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Intellectual Property Practice and a member of the Trademark Copyright Advertising Group. Ms. Alpert focuses her practice on trademark, copyright, advertising, rights of publicity, unfair competition, defamation and libel, and Internet and e-commerce issues. She regularly addresses these topics in a broad spectrum of industries, including online and traditional retailing, clothing and accessories, beverages, computer hardware, computer software, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, telecommunication, and financial...

415-442-1326

About the Author

Partner

Carla B. Oakley is a partner in Morgan Lewis's Intellectual Property Practice.Ms. Oakley focuses on intellectual property litigation and also advises clients on how to protect IP assets, how to minimize risks of conducting business online (including "user generated content" issues), and how to comply with advertising, sweepstakes, and privacy laws. Her experience includes litigation involving trademarks, domain names, copyrights, advertising, unfair competition, rights of publicity, trade secrets, and design patents. Ms. Oakley has first-chair jury trial, appellate, and...

415-442-1301

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.