February 8, 2012

What Rights Do Home-Schooled Children Have to Participate in Interscholastic Sports?

What rights do home-schooled children have to participate in interscholastic sports in West Virginia public schools?  In 2005, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals in Jones v. Marion County Board of Education, et al., ruled "that treating public and nonpublic school children differently with respect to participation in interscholastic sports does not violate equal protection."

In Jones, the home-schooled child was not enrolled in the county school system and did not take any classes at the middle school where he wanted to participate in the wrestling program. The county board of education refused to permit the home-schooled student to participate in the wrestling program.  The county board of education asserted numerous grounds in support of its denial, including (1) promoting academics over athletics, and (2) protecting the economic interests of the county school system (i.e., home-schooled students are not considered in the average daily attendance and enrollment numbers for formula purposes).

Also, the county board of education relied upon Rule 127-2-3 of the West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission ("WVSSAC"), by taking the position that the home-schooled child simply did not meet the legal requirement. Rule 127-2-3 states, "to be eligible for participation in interscholastic athletics, a student must be enrolled full-time in a member school as described in Rule 127-2-6 . . .".  The county board of education refused to permit the home-schooled child to participate in the wresting program and the Court's ruling in Jones upheld the county board's decision. In doing so, the Court stated, "these parents have also chosen to forego the privileges incidental to a public education, one of which is the opportunity to qualify for participation in interscholastic athletics."

With that said, and even in light of the Jones decision, it is important for a county board of education to be aware that home-schooled children do have certain rights to participate in interscholastic sports. In particular,  Rule 127-2-6 of the WVSSAC provides, among other things,  that a child is eligible to participate in interscholastic sports if s/he is doing passing work in at least 20 periods (four subjects with full credit toward graduation/two block courses) per week. In other words, if a home-schooled child is taking four subject or two block courses, s/he is considered "enrolled full-time" and eligible for interscholastic participation (contingent upon meeting other requirements).

As the Court in Jones stated, and as the county board of education argued in that case, "home-schooled children do not contribute to the average daily attendance or enrollment numbers of the public schools." If, however, a home-schooled child enrolls in four subjects with full credit toward graduation/two block courses, the county board of education can utilize the child(ren) in its average daily attendance and enrollment numbers for formula purposes.

As such, if a home-schooled child satisfies, among other things, the "enrollment full-time" requirement, a school that is a WVSSAC member school must allow participation (again, contingent upon meeting other requirements). There are, of course, certain limitations as to when a home-schooled child can begin interscholastic participation (i.e., a nine week period of the home-schooled child attended a WVSSAC member school in the past) but, those secondary issues are not the topic of this month's newsletter. You can find these issues in the WVSSAC Rules and we recommend you review rules if the instant issue every arises. The purpose of this month's newsletter is to remind a county board of education that there are situations in which a home-schooled child has a right to participate in the privilege of interscholastic sports.

© 2009 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Jason's practice concentrates on two areas of law that are quite diverse from each other. One area of Jason’s practice focuses on enforcing the collection rights and security interests of creditors. In this area of the law, he also has experience in defending creditors and debt collection entities in litigation where claims have been asserted against such entities for alleged violations of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protect Act (“WVCCPA”) and/or the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In addition, he has experience in defending automobile manufacturers...

304-225-1417

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.