Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Apr
3
2015
Do You Really Own All Your Intellectual Property? Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
2
2015
.sucks Domain Names Now Available to Brand Owners Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
2
2015
Roxane Labs and Par Pharm v. Jazz Pharm: Denying Institution CBM2014-00161, 175 Faegre Drinker
Apr
2
2015
Agilysys v. Ameranth: Final Written Decision CBM2014-00015 Faegre Drinker
Apr
2
2015
Pre- and Post-Grant Oppositions in India – Part 3 of an 8 Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
2
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 2, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
2
2015
Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., and Netapp, Inc. v. Elec. And Telecommunications Research Institute: Denial of Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00549 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
Trademark Protection: Strategies for Cuba Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
1
2015
Single Color Mark — Functionality Does Not Necessarily Preclude Protectability Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
1
2015
Global Trademark Protection — 5 Practical Considerations Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
1
2015
ZTE (USA), Inc. and Huawei Device USA, Inc. v. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00029 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
Don’t Sleep on Rule 37 Motions re: Patent Litigation Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 1, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
1
2015
Intri-Plex Technologies, Inc. v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Rencol Ltd: Final Written Decision 20150323 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
Paramount, Twentieth Century Fox, and Universal Studios v. Nissim Corp: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00961, 00962 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2015
Quick Fixes and Proposed Rulemaking for PTAB Trial Rules Announced by Director Lee Mintz
Mar
31
2015
FLIR Systems v. Leak Surveys: Authorizing Motion to Submit Supplemental Evidence IPR2015-00065 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2015
Kimble and Post-Expiration Royalties: The Next Big Thing, or Much Ado About Nothing? Mintz
Mar
31
2015
Sixth Circuit Confirms That Uniform Trade Secrets Act Broadly Preempts Related Claims Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Mar
31
2015
Jury Awards $7.4 Million To Family Of Marvin Gaye In "Blurred Lines" Trial Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Mar
31
2015
Supreme Court Rules That Certain TTAB Rulings Have Preclusive Effect In Later Litigation Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Mar
31
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 31, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
31
2015
TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01347 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2015
The Brinkmann Corporation v. A&J Manufacturing: Decision on Institution IPR2015-00056 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2015
No Collateral Challenge Of Patent Application Revival Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
31
2015
Micron Technology, Inc. v. e.Digital Corporation: Denying Motion to Dismiss Petition IPR2015-00519 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2015
Patent Board to Parties: “Call Me” - FLIR Systems v. Leak Surveys McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2015
Sensio, Inc. v. Select Brands, Inc: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00500 Faegre Drinker
Mar
30
2015
Supreme Court: TTAB Decisions May Have Preclusive Effect in Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2015
Prior Art Must Criticize or Otherwise Disparage the Claimed Solution to Constitute a Teaching Away McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2015
Claims Must Be Limited to Financial Activities to Be Covered Business Methods McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2015
B&B Hardware v. Hargis – U.S. Supreme Court Declares TTAB Findings Can Have Preclusive Effect on Subsequent Federal Court Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2015
PTAB Issues Rare Grant of Rehearing and Clarifies Scope of Joinder McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2015
Antedating by Third-Party Reduction to Practice Not Enough: Sensio Inc v. Select Brands McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 30, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins