May 25, 2012

Jack Wenik

  • (973) 643-5268
  • jwenik@sillscummis.com
  • www.sillscummis.com

  • Jack Wenik, a Member of Sills Cummis & Gross,  has extensive federal and state bench and jury trial experience, both civil and criminal. Mr. Wenik has represented a wide array of corporations and individuals in complex civil litigation and grand jury investigations. He has particular expertise representing major health care institutions and physicians in federal and state government investigations and other proceedings. He also has extensive experience representing pharmaceutical companies in product liability litigation and dietary supplement companies in FTC litigation and proceedings. Mr. Wenik also counsels health care institutions, individuals and corporations on regulatory matters.

    Prior to joining the Firm, Mr. Wenik was an Assistant U.S. Attorney for both the Eastern Districts of New York and Pennsylvania.

    Mr. Wenik has been selected for inclusion in the 2010-2012 editions of The Best Lawyers in America® published by Woodard/White under Commercial Litigation, and has an AV rating from Martindale-Hubbell®, its highest rating for legal ability and ethical standards. He is Co-Chair of the Firm's Professional Relations Committee and Chair of the Firm's Litigation Training Committee.

     He received his J.D. from Yale University, School of Law in 1985, where he was Editor of the Yale Law Journal and the Yale Law & Policy Review.  He received his B.A., summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa,  from the State University of New York at Albany in 1982.  He is admitted to practice in  New York, New Jersey and the District of Columbia. 

  • Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.

Articles in the National Law Review database by Jack Wenik:

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.