Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
16
2023
DOJ Incentivizes Voluntary Self-Disclosure in New Safe Harbor Policy for Mergers & Acquisitions K&L Gates
May
12
2024
Identifying a Single Biomolecule Means Single-molecule Detection Sensitivity Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
5
2023
Congress Enacts Major Overhaul to HSR Filing Fees for M&A Deals Bracewell LLP
Feb
6
2019
Energy & Sustainability M&A Activity – February 2019 Mintz
Oct
20
2023
DOJ Unveils Voluntary Self-Disclosure Safe Harbor for M&A Deals McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
21
2015
A Farewell to Alms? Peppercorn Settlements of M&A Litigation Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
29
2013
Major Decision on 2006 Michigan Cable Law Varnum LLP
Jan
10
2023
Get Your Restaurant Business Fit to Transact in 2023 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
4
2013
Italian Franchisee Loses Lawsuit Brought Under The Laws Of . . . California? Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
14
2014
New California LLC Act May Curtail Authority Of Managers Of Pre-Existing LLCs Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Feb
28
2019
Insurance Issues in Mergers and Acquisitions: Key Tips for Transactional Lawyers Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
2
2023
Energy & Sustainability M&A Activity — November 2023 Mintz
May
3
2013
Franchising Bill Moves Forward In California Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
11
2010
The Medical Device Rodeo: Harnessing Innovation Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
22
2020
COVID-19: Buying and Selling PPP Borrowers K&L Gates
Jan
28
2011
Delaware Supreme Court Holds That Chancery Court Is Not Bound By Merger Price Or Fairness Opinion In Appraisal Proceedings Under Delaware General Corporate Law Section 262(h) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
18
2014
Tax Court Characterizes Technology Executive’s Merger Proceeds as Ordinary Income Mintz
Apr
29
2021
Driving the Deal Podcast: Restructuring and Bankruptcy Considerations McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
11
2011
The Patent Monopoly – More Than The Right To Exclude Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jun
13
2013
Yahoo!/Tumblr Deal and the Tax Cost of Cash Acquisition Payments McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Jun
24
2019
Appellate Court Affirms Decision to Block Medical Merger Bracewell LLP
Dec
26
2023
Was 2023 An Annus Horribilis For California Legislative Drafting? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Oct
28
2015
California’s Secured Promissory Note Exemption Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
12
2014
Mergers and Acquisitions Not Always Successful, So Plan Wisely McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Jan
3
2024
2023 ABA Private Target Deal Points Study K&L Gates
Jun
1
2021
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court Nixes a No-Poach Agreement Between Business Partners as Overbroad Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Dec
22
2016
Pending CFIUS Filing: Midea Group Co. Ltd. and KUKA AG Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
19
2014
Affordable Care Act Considerations in Mergers and Acquisitions Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins