Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
19
2015
Valeo North America, Inc.; Valeo S.A.; Valeo GmbH: Granting Leave to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-01203, 01204 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2015
TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01347 Faegre Drinker
Apr
2
2015
Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Co., and Netapp, Inc. v. Elec. And Telecommunications Research Institute: Denial of Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00549 Faegre Drinker
Apr
28
2015
EBay v. Moneycat: Granting Extension of Time to Submit Supplemental Evidence CBM2014-00091-93 Faegre Drinker
Apr
30
2015
Galderma and Q-Med AB v. Allergan: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01417 Faegre Drinker
May
7
2015
Greene’s Energy Group v. Oil States Energy Services: Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2014-00216 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Granting Institution IPR2015-00100 Faegre Drinker
Jun
2
2015
International Business Machines v. Intellectual Ventures I: Granting Motion to Compel Testimony IPR2014-01385 Faegre Drinker
Jun
9
2015
Informatica Corporation v. Protegrity Corporation: Granting-in-Part Denying-in-Part Institution CBM2015-00021 Faegre Drinker
Jun
12
2015
Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation: Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Submit New Testimonial Evidence IPR2015-00594 Faegre Drinker
Jun
29
2015
GN Resound A/S v. Oticon A/S: Denying Rehearing of Institution Denial IPR2015-00103 Faegre Drinker
Jul
1
2015
American Simmental Assoc. v. Leachman Cattle of Colorado: Stay of Pending Reissue Application to Avoid Inconsistencies with Post Grant Review PGR2015-00005 Faegre Drinker
Jul
5
2015
Apple, Inc. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.: Denying Institution Where Declaration and Exhibits Lacked Specificity By Including Information for Multiple Petitions IPR2015-00356 Faegre Drinker
Jul
8
2015
Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corporation: Granting-In-Part Request for Rehearing Because Board Abused Its Discretion Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2015
Versata Development Group v. SAP America: Federal Circuit Affirms First CBM Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2015
Petroleum Geo-Services v. WesternGeco: Denying Motion for Live Testimony to Respond to Lack of Nexus Assertions IPR2014-00687 Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2015
Nanoco Tech. v. Massachusetts Institute of Tech: Institution Granted in Part Where Exclusive Licensee Was Not a Real Party-in-Interest IPR2015-00532 Faegre Drinker
Aug
13
2015
Google Inc. and LinkedIn Corp. v. Priceplay.com, Inc.: Granting Institution of Challenged CBM Claims CBM2015-00025 Faegre Drinker
Aug
26
2015
Chien Luen Industries et al. v. Simon Nicolas Richmond: Denying Patent Owner’s Motion to Terminate IPR2014-00936 Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2015
Predision Components v. Avx Corp: Petitioner Allowed To Correct Clerical Mistake Of Submitting Unexecuted Declaration IPR2015-01332 Faegre Drinker
Sep
3
2015
Olympus Medical Systems Corp v. Perfect Surgical Tech: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00233 FWD 20150608 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2015
Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. v. RB Pharmaceuticals Limited: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Anticipated and Obvious Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2015
MotionPoint Corporation v. TransPerfect Global: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable CBM2014-00060 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
Google Inc., Samsung Electronics v. Microfrafx, LLC: Motion to Amend Denied For Failure to Explain Patentability Over Prior Art of Record IPR2014-00532 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2015
Kaiser Aluminum v. Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood: Conduct of the Proceeding IPR2014-01002 Faegre Drinker
Feb
2
2013
HIPAA/HITECH Omnibus Final Rule: Implications for Healthcare Research Faegre Drinker
Oct
24
2015
PARROT S.A. and PARROT, INC. v. DRONE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Claims Not Found Unpatentable Where Cited Art Was Not Shown To Be Analogous IPR2014-00732 Faegre Drinker
Oct
29
2015
FCA US v. Jacobs Vehicle Systems: Denying Institution When Challenged Claims Were Disclaimed IPR2015-01234 Faegre Drinker
Dec
21
2015
Global Tel*Link Corporation v. Securus Technologies: Final Written Decision Holding that CIP Not Presumed to be Entitled to Earlier Filing Date IPR2014-00824 Faegre Drinker
Dec
29
2015
Starbucks Corporation v. Ameranth: Instituting Review of Challenged Claims CBM2015-00091 Faegre Drinker
Jan
12
2016
CaptionCall v. Ultratec: Denial Of Request for Rehearing Of Final Written Decision That Alleged Secondary Considerations Without Sufficient Evidence IPR2013-00549 Faegre Drinker
Feb
3
2016
Ocean Tomo v. Patent Ratings: Denying Institution for Lack of Standing where Petitioner Not Previously Sued for Patent Infringement CBM2015-00157 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Unified Patents v. Dragon Intellectual Property: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Aug
28
2013
Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report Suggests Improving Patent Quality Faegre Drinker
Mar
1
2016
Luv N’ Care v. Munchkin - Petitioner’s Motion to Compel Testimony and Production of Documents To Rebut Motion to Amend Authorized IPR2015-00872 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins