Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
2
2023
Securities Class Action Filing Activity Fell for Third Straight Year as Volume of M&A Class Actions Declined Cornerstone Research
May
11
2013
How to Minimize Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) Risk in Health Care Acquisitions Mintz
May
23
2013
Missouri Law Expands to Include Sponsored Captive Insurance Companies Armstrong Teasdale
Dec
12
2023
Strip Mall Revival Hunton Andrews Kurth
Nov
21
2014
D.C. Circuit Extends Stay in Battle Over Access to Content Companies’ Confidential Information Covington & Burling LLP
May
30
2013
Delaware Chancery's Latest on Business Judgment Rule Unification: In Re MFW Shareholders Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
7
2013
Delaware Chancery Court Applies Business Judgment Rule to Going Private Transaction with Controlling Stockholder Katten
Mar
12
2014
California Continues Crackdown on 1031 Exchanges - California Franchise Tax Board [VIDEO] Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
May
25
2011
IP Experience in the Due Diligence Process More Important than Ever Vedder Price
Jun
19
2011
China’s MOFCOM Gets Tough on Merger Control? McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
28
2015
California’s Secured Promissory Note Exemption Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
8
2019
A 24% Stockholder of Seller and Seller’s Board Must Face Fiduciary Duty Claims Due to Flawed Sales Process and Inadequate Merger-related Disclosures: Another Merger Challenge Demonstrates the Limits of Corwin Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Jul
16
2019
Court To Sellers: Stockholder Notice Rights Matter K&L Gates
Dec
22
2016
Pending CFIUS Filing: Midea Group Co. Ltd. and KUKA AG Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
25
2019
Mergers and Acquisitions and Other Guidance Published for Component 2 Pay Data Reporting Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
5
2019
Maryland Federal Court Denies Untimely Request to Vacate Arbitration Award Carlton Fields
Oct
13
2011
The Top Five Real Estate Traps in M&A Transactions McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
15
2020
Director Who Led Merger Negotiations, Without Disclosing Details of a Lucrative Pay Package He Was Offered to Lead the Post-Merger Company, Must Face Fiduciary Duty Claims Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Dec
15
2015
Is Franchise Tax Board Argument Nothing More Than Blowing In Wind? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
12
2021
Empty Promises: Contractual Modification Without Consideration Leaves Franchisee Without Recourse Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
28
2020
What Impact has Coronavirus had on Doing Healthcare Deals? [WEBINAR] McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
28
2015
3.65 Comments Extended; FirstNet 2016 Consultation; Municipal Broadband; M&A Compliance Keller and Heckman LLP
Sep
20
2019
California Statute Offers Dramatic Change to Independent Contractor, Franchise-Franchisee Relationships Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
2
2019
In a $1.365 Billion Merger, the Target Company “Blindsided” the Proposed Buyer by Terminating the Merger Agreement and the Court Upheld the Termination; Court Requests Further Briefing Re the $126.5 Million Reverse Termination Fee K&L Gates
Apr
24
2014
Lenders - Don't Forget Your Endorsements! Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Jul
27
2021
Foley Weekly Automotive Report July 27: Truck Shortages, COVID, and Self-Driving Software Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
3
2021
Court Finds No Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Director Of California Corporation Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Apr
30
2014
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Availability of Business Judgment Rule in Controlling Stockholder Mergers Hunton Andrews Kurth
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins